|
|
|
Going pop - is it worth the trouble?
Udit
Narayans fourth private album Jaanam, is out in the market. Going
by current (non) standards of Indipop, it may be an above-average album,
but considering the fact that it is a vehicle for one of filmdoms
topmost singers, it is remarkably disappointing. The songs have the kind
of negative virtues (like those dry Rajshri films in the 70s), but
save for a couple of songs which linger, the rest drone on, and you have
forgotten how a predecessor goes while hearing the following track. Which
is doubly sad when you consider the fact that Udit has sung them with
his customary soulfulness, and with far less pronounciation defects (his
Achilles Heel) than usual.
His previous albums, a non-starter whose name escapes me, and I Love You,
which initially sold quite well and established a name for Wings Music,
and Love Is Life the follow-up, had precisely the same problem - the songs
kowtowed to Udits image, his forte and his style. No one, neither
the company nor the composer, nor to be fair, Udit himself, found it necessary
to break new
ground, meet compositional and vocal challenges and achieve what was the
express purpose of coming out with the album in the first place - establishing
their distinct identity. Udits name helped sell the album, when
the actual idea was to establish a following for Udit the singer, as against
Udit, that saleable playback voice for top stars.
When she came out with Tum Yaad Aaye, Alka Yagnik told me that the reason
why she entered the field of private albums was
that very few people were aware of Alka Yagnik per se. "When I sang
a mega-hit like Ek do teen char," she told, "I was the last
person associated with it by the public. To them it was a Madhuri Dixit
song all the way, and after that it was associated with the film, the
music directors and the lyricist! But its unfair to belittle the
contribution of a singer in any hit song." Maybe this focussed missionary
fire brought her to excel in the album, helped in no small measure by
Raju Singhs caressing tunes and Javed Akhtars supple lyrics.
And to date, Tum Yaad Aaye remains the only super-successful private album
of any top female playback singer.
Which brings us to the piquant point - is all the effort worth it? Looking
at Alkas exceptional case, it would seem as if the singers are better
off doing playback and leaving the private scene to those
who are struggling to make a name for themselves. Today, Sonu Nigam has
quit anchoring the TV show Sa Re Ga Ma not because his album Deewana (again
the only successful album of a top male playback artist) broke all previous
sales records in basic albums, but because he wants to focus on singing
in general - and he knows that 95% of this singing is for films.
Kumar Sanu - poor man - could never get even an average private album
and whatever success he has had outside the film ambit is restricted to
cover versions and Bengali albums. In Hindi, all of his basic work (a
couple of ghazal albums and a horrendous 1996 excrescence called Jiye
Jaa) never even joined the race.
Kavita Krishnamurthi and Poornima came up with fine albums - the former
with Koi Akela Kahan on Plus Music and the latter with Chal Shirdi Ke
Ore, also on Wings, but neither of them being the kind of pop-corn encouraged
by channels and the powers-that-be, they sank into anonymity again. Preeti
Uttams Sur was another prize package (complete with a state-of-the-mart
video of acrobatic females for a semi-classical song!) Sunidhi Chauhans
album - says the singer herself - had its prospects damaged beyond repair
by the music company itself and Jaspinder Narulas Kuch Kuch Dil
Mein was average in performance and calibre. Anuradha Paudwal got the
pits in Ahsaas and Sadhana Sargam never even got to record one.
One can argue that Shanker Mahadevan had his ace, Breathless, but then
there are two things: Breathless did better than most albums because of
its inherent quality and novelty, but was certainly no super-seller. Moreover,
Shanker yet has to get a hit solo status as singer in Hindi films, and
the poor guy is till typecast in alaaps and songs that need someone to
holler at a high pitch (Que sera sera/Pukar). Vinod Rathods and
Sukhwindara Singhs albums came and went unnoticed and unmarketed.
On the other hand, Hema Sardesais Hindustani Gudiya and Abhijeets
Main Deewana Hoon failed to get the recognition and success they deserved.
Abhijeet feels that the video was bad and that it sabotaged the sales,
but that is a very unconvincing excuse indeed. The songs were too classy
- with a couple of exceptions - to succeed.
And thats the nub. The formula for a hit album, like a hit film,
simply does not exist. You can flop because you are too commercial or
if you are quite classy. The perfect tight-rope is needed, and that happens
and cannot be engineered. The magic of Deewana could not be repeated -
appeal-wise or sales-wise - with its designer follow-up Jaan. And Sonus
Mausam came a cropper, while his utterly crass Kismat fared relatively
better.
Says Abhijeet, "I am being very careful about every aspect of my
new album. In one year we have only finalised half the tunes. Because
we singers are the stars. You will not watch a Raj Kapoor film or song
every day, but no day passes without hearing Mukeshs voice. And
so is the case with Lataji, Ashaji, Rafisaab and Kishoreda. Many dont
even know the films or the stars name, but the song is instantly
recognised by its singer.
But if this is the case (as seems so), and Alka is underestimating her
own importance in her chart-toppers, why bother to sing basic albums?
After all, Mukesh, Lata and Rafi all did private albums galore in their
days, but they are remembered overwhelmingly for their immortal film songs.
Should playback singers stick to playback? I pop this query
to you.
Rajiv Vijayakar
|