|
|

|
Rahman
unplugged
The
Rahman effect in film music is not something that can be
easily comprehended or explained in normal terms. Never has a music director-composer
created this kind of hype, spurred so much speculation, fuelled so many
contrasting (thats an understatement) emotions and opinions and
single-handedly altered the very complexion of film music.
Everything about him is so outre that the one word that can encapsulate
Rahman and to which both friend and foe will at once agree on is unique.
Rahmans entry into Hindi films itself was well, different. His first
Tamil film was dubbed as Roja in Hindi in 1993, and no one remotely expected
either the film or the music to be the rage they went on to become. So
different was Rahman from the breed that our over-worked, under-trained
music directors during that period had already re-worked his songs (in
films like Meherbaan), as at that stage, they could not have even dreamt
of Roja being dubbed, let alone becoming a sell-out album and a super-hit
film!
Rahmans next chartbusting scores in Tamil, The Gentleman, broke
fresh records, and made indirect news in Bollywood. Mahesh Bhatt decided
to remake the film and signed Nadeem-Shravan, who quit the film because
they were told to re-do two or three of the original tunes. In stepped
the compromise-friendly Anu Malik, who re-worked two of Rahmans
numbers from the Tamil original as Roop Suhana Lagta Hai and Chik Pik
Rika.
But it was in 1995 that the Rahman hype really began, as Rahman confirmed
his different and hit credentials with the chartbusting
scores of two more dubbed films, Bombay and Humse Hain Muqabala the latters
Muqabala spawning a record six copies including O Jaaneman Chehera Tera
(Raghuveer), the hit Sanu-Alka duet from Sabse Bada Khiladi and even a
non-film album composed by Pradeep Lad. And just as Hindi
film music directors were writing him off as a dubbed film music maker,
Rahman flummoxed the opposition and snatched a major award from under
the noses of Rajesh Roshan (Karan Arjun) and Jatin Lalit (Dilwale Dulhania
Le Jayenge) for his toe-thumping score in Rangeela.
| He
came, he saw and he left his indelible stamp on the Hindi film music
scene. And he is now creating music for an English play with Andrew
Lloyd Webber in London. For some, he is a demi-God. There are those
who feel that he is not worth raving about. But no one can ignore
A.R. Rahman. Why? Rajiv Vijayakar tries to analyse the Rahman effect. |
Few scores in Hindi film history had the sheer physicality
of Rangeelas songs like Yai re, Tanha tanha, Hai rama and Pyar yeh
jaane kaisa hai, all of which set the adrenaline pumping and the hormones
tangoing. With these three films, Rahman emerged as the pop icon of the
90s- for which other genre (including Indipop) could match film
music in popularity?
Like the emergence of every major force in music - (Shanker-Jaikishan
in 1949-50, Laxmikant-Pyarelal in 1963, R.D. Burman in 1971-72, Bappi
Lahiri in 82-83, and Nadeem-Shravan in 90-91) - Rahman left the competition
gaspingly disoriented. The reactions were equally varied - senior composer
Pyarelal declared that with his ignorance of Hindi, Rahman would not sustain;
Anand-Milind, Rajesh Roshan and Anu Malik grew insecure enough to go in
for more sources of inspiration, Jatin-Lalit could not fathom why an all-hit,
original and melodious score like Dilwale Dulhaniya Le Jayenge lost the
award to Rangeela and Nadeem-Shravan, the men most affected by the Rahman-Malik
onslaught, simply declared that Rahmans music was like the chorus
of municipal workers on their job in the streets.
Keen observers predicted early cracks in the Rahman edifice and they were
proved both right and wrong. Rukmani was traced to a foreign source, severe
repititiousness and a lack of range was pointed out in subsequent scores
like the dubbed Chor Chor (Thiruda Thiruda), Tu Hi Mera Dil, Priyanka
and Love Birds and Rahman was accused of excessively relying on musical,
vocal and even lyrical gimmicks.
Rahman gave a new definition to clever redesigning of metres and tunes.
But an 8-year-old girl with a penchant for vintage film music traced the
lineage of Muqabala to Shanker Jaikishans evergreen Pyar hua ikraar
hua, and his Hindustani chartbuster Tada was discovered to have its moorings
in Har nazar ke sau afsane, the vintage delight sung by Lata Mangeshkar
for Usha Khanna. And Khanna herself was known to get inspired
by West Asian Music!
Admittedly, his original scores-usually-were a shade better than his dubbed
work, but many of the songs had the same rehashed quality (like Shabba
shabba from Daud being a pale version of Kya kare kya na kare from Rangeela).
But with Rahman stubbornly refusing to acquaint himself with Hindi his
lyrical standards went for a complete toss.
What then made Rahman taste mega-success? A major factor was that he was
saleable. Even his disasters first reached the top of the
pops solely on his name before hurtling towards ignominy. Rahmans
image was that of a pop star who was shy, unassuming and the still-water-runs-deep
kind of genius. His rebellious look at rhythm, orchestration and sound
raised the hackles of the Orthodox school, sent the hep crowd into a frenzy,
and made the competition both in the South and Bollywood do a rethink
on whether to lose the race or follow his path. For the music companies
and channels of course, he was a blessing.
Aligning with Sukhwindara Singh, Rahman dared step into North Indian territory
as he focussed for a while on Hindi films made by filmmakers like Subhash
Ghai, Boney Kapoor, Govind Nihalani and even Deepa Mehta.
Rahman has long realized that to sustain in Hindi cinema he has to merge
the musical grammar within him with Hindustani music as much as he does
with Western styles. The first major step Rahman took in this direction
was Dil Se (1998) with which he began his gradual evolution into a Hindi
film composer.
Everyone knows the origins of Chal Chhaiyyaan Chaiyyaan by now, but Rahman
scored decisively with two lovely numbers Jiya Jale Jaan Jale and Udits
even more splendid Ae ajnabee. Followed Taal, the splendid 1947 - Earth,
Pukar, (Ek tu hi bharosa, Sunta hai mera khuda, the classic Qismat se
tum humko mile ho) and surprise surpise - even the dubbed Dil Hi Dil Mein
in which Rahman salvaged the mediocre score with two terrific numbers
without even a whiff of his roots - Ae Nazneen Suno Na and Chand utra
hai zameen pe, sung by Udit and Kavita.
Admittedly, Rahman is now after bigger game, though in the South his music
has been rarely known to fail. He is doing an English play with Andrew
Loyd Webber and is eyeing the international scene in a big way even as
he has curtailed his work for Hindi films (he currently has Aamir Khans
Lagaan, Rajkumar Santoshis Lajja and some old assignments that are
progressing slowly like One Two Ka Four and Love You Hameshaa).
But there is another entirely plausible side to it: Rahman is fully aware
that he can neither be prolific nor as efficient in delivering music outside
his natural bent. To stick to selected Hindi films would be the perfect
solution, his international ambitions notwithstanding.
As veteran Naushad said, He (Rahman) is extremely talented, but
he is completely Western in his outlook. While Nida Fazli lauds
his trend-setting ingenuity and distinct style, the Western music-trained
Vanraj Bhatia shares Naushads opinion broadly by stating that Rahman
is too conscious of technical aspects and loses out on the soul and lasting
melody - despite having the talent.
So where precisely does Rahman stand today? Is he the much-needed saviour
of music, a brilliant leader, an artful fake or the destroyer of music?
Blasphemous as it may sound, he is all of these together. Rahman showed
us the tremendous importance and immaculate balancing of sound, to compete
with the best from the West, and popularized Indian music abroad, getting
Indian musicians noticed and admired by their counterparts in the West.
He paved the way for greater interaction with Western musicians and enjoys
tremendous popularity among NRIs chiefly because his music is a heady
amalgam of the music from their roots and that they have grown up with.
Back home, he has inspired every composer in the rat-race to emulate him
to some degree or other, and proved that you dont need the support
of a film or a top playback singer, or a particular orchestral formula
to deliver a sixer at the charts.
At the same time, the man has forever corroded the identity of Hindi film
music which our master-composers helped delineate painstakingly from classical
or folk forms right from the late 30s.
Rahmans globalization of music will never be forgiven by passionate
addicts of Hindi film music from the 30s to the early 90s.
Despite his limited Hindi oeuvre (about a dozen original films and 12-15
dubbed ones) he has shown very limited range. And despite the hype, has
been exposed long ago by passionate (and unbiased) listeners as being
far from the phenomenal genius he is touted out to be.
In short, he is a composer who is greatly talented, not too versatile,
hard working and willing to learn and experiment (when he chooses) - a
human figure who has been raised to the status of a demi-God by those
who actually do not even understand his music. If he learns his lessons
well (as he seems to have done till now), he will remain a potent force,
especially since he works to and never works beyond his capacity.
But if he begins to believe in the chimera his sycophants and fans have
built around him, it is we music lovers who will miss out on superb creations
like Banno Rani (1947), Roshan Hui Raat (Sapnay), Pyaare Panchhi Baahon
Mein (Hindustani) and Ishq Bina (Taal).
|