|
|
B |
Focus
The
state of the South Indian film industry in terms of box-office returns
is no different from the Hindi film industry. However, Tamil and Telugu
films have been an exception and provide a silver lining to an otherwise
bleak picture...
This Summer, four Tamil films, out of the ten released, have done very
good business. Some Telugu films have also done well. As for films in
other southern languages, the success ratio is too low.
L Suresh, a knowledgeable Tamil film industry expert, said: This
summer has been very good for Tamil films. Out of 10, four films
have been hits. Mani Ratnam is back on the success track with his Tamil
film Alaiparude which is expected to cross the 100-day run mark in eight
to ten centres. Even its dubbed version in Telugu has done extra-ordinary
business. Another hit film is Vijay Kumars own production, Vallarasu,
which will also celebrate its 100-day run. A small-budget social-cum-mythological
production like Rajkaliamman has also done very good business vis-a-vis
its cost.Koshi is yet another film which is doing very well. The year
had started on a dismal note but later things brightened up and the industrys
morale is high.
AR Raju, veteran producer and distributor of Kannada and Telugu films
(mostly D Rama Naidus films), says that generally, the success ratio
for films made in any south Indian language is 10 to 1 or two. However,
this year six to seven Tamil and Telugu films have been hits. The
cost of films, he added, is mounting. Today, the cost of production
of a Tamil or Telugu film is around Rs 3.5 crores, while in the case of
a Kannada film it is Rs 1.5 crores. Kannada films like Upendra, Shabd
Bhedi and Preetse have done well. Kalisi Undamu Raa, Semungavilli Labhamugh
Randi and Annayya in Telugu have been the successful films. Only 50 per
cent of the remake films in Kannada have fared well.
KV Gupta, former president of the South Indian Film Chamber of Commerce,
said: The cost of production is going up because of the unseemly
competition among producers who run after previously successful artistes,
irrespective of whether they are really required or not as per dictates
of the story. These artistes are paid much more, the amounts being disproportionate
to the returns their names bring. In addition to production costs, the
costs of exhibition, distribution and publicity of films have also gone
beyond manageable limits compared to amounts of recovery at the box-office.
Producers only are responsible for the present sorry state of affairs.
Earlier, producers used to base their stories on the regional milieu but
today they are making films of an all-India character with subjects which
have no relevance to the social conditions of the region where they are
exhibited with the result that the audience is forced to see glamour and
not reality. Today, it has become impossible for any producer to make
a film within the stipulated budget since the expenses mount as he attempts
to give his film gloss of the kind seen in Hindi and English films. As
a result he always fails and suffers. Previously, producers used to select
a subject for their film, decide the cost structure involved in its mounting
and discuss the feasibility of their project with the distributors who
were aware of the taste of the public through the exhibitors.
That is absent today. What is happening is a distributor supplies pictures
on the basis of fixed hire. Since the theatre rental is fixed, an exhibitor
runs a film only if it has a face value. This is how the star system has
crept in. The distributor has to recover his cost by hook or crook. But
increase in the exhibition outlets is not in keeping with the increase
in the production of films.
KV Maruti, secretary of the Karnataka Film Chamber of Commerce, said that
the electronic media was eating into the box-office collections of films
as pirated cassettes were shown on cable. That was the reason why Hindi
films were not running beyond one or two weeks on the Mysore circuit.
Dwarkeesh, veteran actor and producer of Kannada films, lamented that
there were more proposal makers than filmmakers. We need more filmmakers
like Rakesh Roshan who can make good films and not fly-by-night producers
who dish out routine fare, he said and added, today, the actors
are ruling the industry and not producers. I have made 45 films so far
including in Hindi, but today, it is impossible for filmmakers like me
to bow down before artistes and make films. What we need is more filmmakers
with whom we can compete and not proposal makers.
Raghavendra Rajkumar, who is at the helm of his fathers film production
business, said that film business was on low key because of lack of competitors
not only among film makers but also film stars. We hardly have any
good stories. Even in Kannada films, there are hardly one or two top stars
and able directors. Originality is at a low ebb and creativity is missing
with the result that we are doing remakes. While the Government of Karnataka
is giving tax benefits on the one hand, it prohibits shooting of films
at Cubbon Park or Lalbag on the other. A film is entitled to subsidy only
if 75 per cent of it is shot in Karnataka, and not otherwise. Further,
it is the KFCC that decides which film deserves subsidy, which is hardly
Rs 10 lakhs. Films like Upendra and Shabd Bhedi have done better business
but they are not super hits. Compared to Tamil and Telugu, the Kannada
film industry has less stars. Producers who depend on one top star keep
idle till that star is available.
Whereas in Tamil and Telugu there are more stars and the producers are
able to make a choice. Kannada film producers are fighting for remake
rights of hit Tamil and Telugu films. As many as eight films are on the
floor which are remakes of either Tamil or Telugu hits. The market for
Kannada films is also restricted to the Mysore territory alone because
Hindi films are dominating in Bombay Karnataka and Gulbarga, Telugu films
in Bellary and Hyderabad Karnataka area and Tamil films in Kolar and Hosur
areas. Therefore, Kannada films face stiff competition from non-Kannada
films. The fact that seven to eight prints of Tamil and Telugu films are
screened in Karnataka proves that the market for Kannada films is shrinking.
But this is not the case in Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh where Kannada
films are not shown regularly, which is a pity.
P Gangadharan, president of the Kerala Film Chamber of Commerce, said,
The condition of the Malayalam film industry is very bad. The costs
of production is going up owing to several factors, while the returns
are diminishing. The cost of a medium budget Malayalam film is around
Rs 2 crore, while a big star-cast film costs anywhere between Rs 3 to
4 crore. Out of 20 films released this year, only one or two have succeeded
at the box-office. This is because of video piracy and satellite channels
screening Malayalam movies. It is my surmise that this year the production
of Malayalam films will come down to just 40 from last years figure
of 60.
MSM Desai
|