|
|
 |
Editorial
Taxing
the Living Dead
It's
the last thing we needed. Another back-breaking tax to cripple the Mumbai
entertainment industry, thats already reeling under the worst ever
resource crunch in its history. From one financially bankrupt entity --
the Maharashtra government to another which seems to be getting there.
Slowly, yet surely.
Now, that the notifications have been issued, its all become official,
too. Four per cent sales tax will now be levied on every transfer of rights,
from the actual copyright down to the metallic containers used for the
traffic of goods.
And there isnt even the slightest whiff of ambiguity in the phrasing.
Its a cold, premeditated ploy to milk the industry dry, a draconian
levy thats best fought collectively, rather than in the form of
ineffectual letters of "prayer" and "request" from
the individual trade bodies.
Only a government thats bankrupt both ideologically and financially
would come up with a desperate, ill-informed tax of this sort. Should
the industrys talks with chief minister Vilasrao Deshmukh on June
11 fail to result in a roll-back of the hideous tax, the entertainment
sector must call for a strike as a collective show of protest. Factionalism
and egos must not be allowed to come in the way of a joint strike. The
entire industry will be affected by the ramifications of the tax. So protest
jointly we must.
WE'RE ALL IN IT
TOGETHER
One things for sure, all of showbiz will carry the burden of the
new levy. Transfer of copyright of all kinds will come under the purview
of the tax -- from film and television software to music and video.
The Maharashtra Sales Tax Act on the Transfer of Rights to Use Any Goods
for Any Purpose Act, 1985, has now been amended to include Copyright,
thus necessitating a 4 per cent tax on it. This isnt the first time
its being introduced -- an equally desperate Maharashtra government
had done so 15 years ago, only to roll back the levy after a total industry
strike lasting a month. It had then appointed finance secretary, Madhav
Godbole, to look into whether the tax was justified. The result? He suggested
it was not. Whats more, Godbole even reported, "Films are not
sold, only the exhibition rights are transferred under the Bombay Sales
Tax Act, 1959. Hence there should be no sales tax on the transfer of copyright
by film producers." The landmark finding, notwithstanding, the state
has now decided to reintroduce the levy it had once abolished.
Either the Deshmukh government has not bothered to delve into history
at all, or has decided the altered circumstances justify the levy. Does
it really?
Look closer, and youll know things have gotten only a great deal
worse for showbiz since 1985. The ratio of hits to flops has fallen drastically.
Now for every release that manages to break even, there are 30 that dont.
In fact, the distributors and exhibitors who bear the brunt of it all,
are at the very brink of extinction, today. After all, how much longer
can they continue to bankroll one box-office dud after another?
State Most Hostile
to Showbiz
DOES the prevailing regime in the state favour the crunch-hit industry?
Well, decide for yourself.
Despite all the fanfare with which industry status was granted to filmdom,
the benefits that go with it are yet to trickle down. Electricity and
water are yet to be provided to it at industrial rates. Studio and set
rentals still cost the producers a tidy packet, with even the state-owned
Film City charging a premium for the meagre services it provides. Shooting
on roads, beaches and port property dont come cheap, either, and
permission to shoot at public places never comes easy. In the absence
of a single window system, thats being tried out in some states
like Andhra Pradesh, Mumbais filmmakers have to run from pillar
to post getting the sanctions on time.
When other states levy as little as 15 to 30 per cent by way of entertainment
tax, Maharashtra charges an exorbitant 60 per cent. Coming as it does,
at a time when collections from theatres have hit an all-time low, ET
comes like insult after injury. And remember, TV, cable TV and video parlours
pay no ET at all. Why then, should films alone be targeted?
Thanks to the prevailing hostile environment, there are hardly around
1100 cinemas in the state, as against more than 2500 each in Andhra and
Tamil Nadu.
All said and done, Maharashtras turning out to be quite hostile
to showbiz, especially when governments elsewhere are proving to be increasingly
movie-savvy. Thats why the new sales tax policy seems so short-sighted.
Its burden, too, will be passed down the line, to the exhibitor and eventually,
the hapless moviebuff. All this, merely to bankroll the jumbo, over-sized
state government.
Shaju George Alex
|