GOLD
DOWN THE DRAIN
In these days when even mediocre stuff is promoted
to the skies, one cant help ponder over the converse, of how good albums
go waste due to lack of promotion.
The reasons why good music isnt given its due
by its own music label range from the commercial (these are termed
practical reasons or economic constraints) or political.
While these can be at least explained despite the perverted logic behind
them, there is no explanation or excuse for the third and commonest
reason, that is, a laidback attitude by the company towards that specific
album (or artiste).
What is peculiar about this lackadaisical attitude
is that contrasting states of
affairs
generate it! If a film is a (expectedly or actual) big hit, the label concerned
takes it as an assumption that the albums sales will be proportionately
high. So the album is left to fend for itself!
If the film is a flop, or is expected to be, or is
class material (who judges that?), then it is assumed that the
album will sell limitedly anyway, and that only those interested will buy
it, hype or no hype.
The same twisted logic is applied to non-film albums,
where the popular rating of an artiste (or genre) or their (supposed) popular
potential decides the matter.
Most music companies today (except for the
less-than-handful professional ones who market their repertoire without
discrimination, and have sales to vindicate this wholly praiseworthy stand)
are guilty of this, some more than others. In the past, this did not matter
so much, because the total output on the music stands was less, the people
knew their minds, had clear-cut preferences and narrow spectrums of
purchase.
For example, a film-music lover would practically
never buy a classical album, and an Indian music aficionado would practically
never be a listener of Western music. But today, when the consumer is influenced
heavily by TV and other media promos, it becomes mandatory for the music
company to see that no good music goes down the drain for any of these
reasons.
If a
bad album sells well on good advertising, then why wont good stuff?
Besides, music companies should also look beyond mere commerce. Adroit
sales-strategy works despite adversity: it is not only its musical richness
which enabled the album of the 1996 Khamoshi to be a chart-topper despite
(and after) the films failure: PolyGrams promotion had a lot
to do with it. The music of Kareeb and Dil Se sold well despite the calamitous
fate of their parent film.
In the olden days, good music always survived the
parent films poor performance, but then that was a different era with
just one music company around.
In the case of basic albums, with no film performance
to fall back on, I feel specifically compelled to mention five stand-out
albums which never got their due. The otherwise very market-savvy and meticulous
Magnasound strangely left musical gold like Tere Firaq Mein to fend for itself
last year. Here was a superb album of Ek Se badh Kar Ek ghazals vocalised
by two of our very best singers Suresh Wadkar and Kavita Krishnamurthi
at their best. Granted that it would never get the quantum of market-share
a Daler Mehndi would command but it nevertheless could have made a major
(and supremely deserved) impact if it had been projected skillfully. After
all, ghazals have always been saleable when coming from established talents
and Wadkar and Kavita have consolidated their formidable credentials
long ago.
Another ghazal album which suffered majority was Ghulam
Alis Samunder on Ultra (with some ghazals contributed by the
practically-unknown Amjad Parvez). Here was an album where eight out of eight
tracks scored. The sterling album, Sapnay, brought out by Zee Music as a
vehicle for the TVS Sa Re Ga Ma finalists, was left to fend for itself in
an era when even heavyweights need to be promoted to sell. And it was full
of lovely songs.
In 1997, BMG-Crescendo released the music of Chand
Grahan, the music of a TV serial which happened to contain the last recordings
of Mukesh, a mindblowing Asha Bhosle title-track and two Lata numbers taped
in the 70s. The music was superb, and strangely did not sound dated
at all. But despite timing its release well with Mukeshs death anniversary,
it was never given a media boost.
And the way in which the Amit Kumar album Mad was
hashed up in 1994 is enough to drive any creative artiste mad. A brilliant
album by any, let alone pop standards, it was simply not promoted
at all! Five years after, the album still sounds as exciting and contemporary,
and its lyrics are amazingly topical!
In an era when genuinely enduring music is at a premium,
it becomes the music markets inescapable and prime responsibility to
ensure that no musical gold goes down the drain. And they can only do this
by making us as aware of its existence as any other tin or
copper album!
And by letting the people make a choice. And they
will be surprised at the result. Wasnt it at the peak of the disco
wave that ghazals and bhajans sold most? And didnt 1942-A Love Story
rule in the season of smut? |