THE SHOW
MUST GO ON
Most of
the chat shows on the air these days are chit-chat shows, Shatrughan
Sinha had declared a year ago. Hed promised that The Shotgun Show would
be different. It would be hot, controversial, fiery, a no-holds-barred talk
show with his trademark elan. It was the first talk-show to boast of a sponsor,
Polar, from the very first episode. Telecast on Zee, the show initially seemed
like an ideal platform for addressing the myriad problems faced by the country
despite the apprehensions that Sinha would use the show to air his and his
partys (Bharatiya Janata Party) views. Sufficient hype had been created,
for this was the first time an established personality was hosting a talk-show.
And Sinha being a volatile and vociferous orator, expectations from him and
his show were sky-high.
However,
after a year of telecast we find that The Shotgun Show hasnt exactly
managed to hit the jackpot. In fact, its not even been able to notch-up
good TRPs though producer-director Shashi Ranjan claims otherwise. He insists
that the very first episode on nationalism which had M V Kamath, Sunil Dutt,
G R Khairnar and Arun Shourie on its panel had got a rating of 4 plus. He
adds that subsequently the TRPs went upto 7. And in the same breath Ranjan
points out, TRPs in this country are a hoax! He claims that they do not reflect
the taste of the majority of the viewers who reside in the interiors. When
we went to Chitrakut, a small village in MP, the crowd there went hysterical
seeing Shatrughan Sinha. They called him Shotgun, obviously referring to
the show and when they realised that I was the director, they made me promise
that I'd address their problems in the show, beams
Ranjan.
As promised
by Sinha, the show in the course of one year tackled controversial issues
like the problems of Kashmiri Pundits, the film industrys nexus with
the mafia, sex and violence in films, prohibition, to name a few. Its
probably the only talk-show to have had maximum number of eminent personalities
on its panel. However, beginning with five to six celebrity panelists it's
now down to three. Says Ranjan, We realised that it was just becoming
a hotch-potch. Nobody had enough time to air his/her views. Thirty minutes
is too short a time for a talk-show. We require atleast forty five
minutes.
Besides
the duration, another problem faced by the show was the recurrent change
in timeslots. To begin with, it was telecast at an unearthly hour, 10 pm
on Sunday. I was not happy with the slot but it was Zees
decision, says Ranjan matter-of-factly. Zee tossed the show around
dictated by everyone's whims. At one point it was shown on Zee India everyday.
The only two serious programmes they had were The Shotgun Show and
Rubaru, so they kept showing them after the elections were over, reveals
Ranjan. The show has had repeat telecasts umpteen times on Zee itself. Now,
it is shown at 12.30pm on Sunday. And, the viewership has slumped,
laments Ranjan. Viewers are totally confused. Since it is repeated
often, it only adds to their confusion, says Ranjan. He is at a loss
to explain why Zees doing this to his show. ''It's the only talk-show
on Zee and I fail to understand why it's not given sufficient publicity why
it is not promoted better, he grouses.
In fact,
Ranjan had conceived the idea of doing a talk-show three years ago and had
approached Zee at that time. But Zee did not understand the concept.
When the management changed he approached them again and this time he got
the green signal. The main problem one faces with the talk-show according
to Ranjan is that the audience is not very articulate before a camera. He
cites the example of riot victims who were very vociferous about police brutality
when he spoke to them individually but when they were on the show they clammed
up. When I asked a woman why she wasnt talking about her experience
she said, Yahan to bade bade sahab baithe hain. Unke saamne mein kya
bolu because the panelists were A A Khan and KPS Gill. Consequently,
the episode turned out to be a damp suib," Ranjan remembers.
Another
reason for talk-shows not being as popular as their western counterparts
is that people who come on the panel use it as a means to propagate their
agendas. Politicians have hidden agendas, laughs Ranjan. He cites
the instance of Kalpnath Rai, Madanlal Khurana and George Fernandes who had
been invited on the panel to talk about corruption. Kalpnath Rai tried to
defend himself because he was allegedly involved in corruption, which was
understandable. But what perplexed Ranjan was his uncalled for devotion to
George Fernandes. We were taken aback with the way he was going on
and on about Fernandes achievements. Two months later I understood
what it was all about. He was trying to work his way into the Samata Party
and eventually succeeded, he smiles.
One episode that
crackled the screen with its intensity was the one on Kashmiri Pundits. The
show had the victims of Pannun Kashmir, Kuldip Nayar and Yaseen Malik, JKLF
president on the panel, and the debate was so hot and fiery that it had to
be divided into three episodes. For 20 days Zee couldnt decide whether
the episode should be aired or not. Even the sponsors were uncomfortable
with the show and decided to withdraw from the show claims Ranjan. The
problem is that brands refuse to associate themselves with serious shows.
They prefer frivolous film-based programmes, he rues. Hes upset
with Zee too. They havent handled the show properly. Everything
was done haphazardly, he complains.
So the moot
question is, after 52 episodes, will The Shotgun Show continue? Of
course it will. Despite all the problems the show is popular. However, after
52 episodes the show will be visually different. I am going to change the
format, Ranjan promises. And the channel too? I cant say
anything right now, he says evasively.
With Sinha
now firmly entrenched in Delhi how is he planning to shoot further episodes?
Fortunately, he understands the potential of the programme and hes
very professional. So therell be no problems, Ranjan assures.
Of the other talk shows, he has a high regard for Vir Sanghvis A Question
Of Answers which has good panelists and topics. He adds that
STAR Plus in the last one year has emerged as a thought-provoking channel
and is very good at promoting news and current affairs shows.
In all probability thats where you'll find The Shotgun Show next!
T A K I N G
A S H O T |
The
only good thing about The Shotgun Show is the host Shatrughan Sinha. He has
an imposing personality and with his characteristic dialogue delivery makes
an impact. That apart the show has nothing new to offer. Sinha is not able
to provoke the panelists. Theres no input in the form of investigative
questions. Besides, lot of episodes are repeated.
Mahesh Mathur, chartered accountant
The Shotgun
Show tackles good subjects. But Shatrughan Sinha tends to dominate the show.
It is anchor-oriented but one can relate to a talk-show only if it is
audience-oriented.
Reena Bhatt, student
I like The
Shotgun Show because it deals with topics that are happening.
Even the discussions are very thought-provoking. The only problem is that
Shatrughan Sinha tries to hold centrestage which is irritating. Half the
time he tries to impose his views on the panelists.
Lohitha Kunder, housewife
The subjects
are interesting and the questioning is probing. But when the panelists are
answering they are often cut short by the host which is detracting. Many
a times they come up with brilliant answers but are unable to complete their
sentences. Given the time constraint, I think The Shotgun Show is doing quite
well. |
|
|