 |
|
Urmi
Juvekar
|
The writer
of Shararat unwinds on how the story germinated from a mere idea
and evolved into a compelling full-blown script...
It is almost
four years now that the idea of Shararat came rushing to us. Gurudev
Bhalla and I were glancing through some books when we saw this photograph,
which instantly caught our attention. "Thats the film
I want to make," Guru said immediately. I think that is the
only time we ever agreed!
It was a photograph
of an old man and a young boy. It was bursting with a story. What
fun it would be to put a young boy and an old man together. The
story could be about the unbridgeable generation gap.
An old man and a young boy will forever disagree on everything.
Just think about arguing with your grandfather about the merits
of sleeping till late in the day, or the other way around, if you
are the grandfather. I was excited about working on a story that
had two such opposite characters. What will these two do? Will they
get along well with each other or will they fight - if so who will
win? I was having a grand time just thinking about their clashes.
There were many situations I already knew of, either from personal,
or friends experiences. If these two were to share a room,
they would soon be at loggerheads. What happens, do you keep the
fan on at night or not? What is wrong in not switching off the lights?
Is it a crime to throw your wet towel on the bed?
Soon all the
old people I had ever met in life wanted a share in the story. The
first to land up were my neighbours, a lady and her sixty year old
kid brother who could do nothing right. Then came the bragging friend
of my fathers who did everything better than you. Next in
line was the couple who hadnt made their peace even after
forty years of marriage. There was my great grandmother who could
not remember what happened five minutes back but quoted fluently
from the Scriptures!
There were some characters from Hindi films; Harindranath Chattopadhya
from Bavarchi - that loveable thug, who hoarded his money and distrusted
all, certainly belonged to Ashiyana, the old age home in the film.
He is the best old man the Hindi movies ever created. Who will ever
be able to forget that wicked grin and that plotting, cunning mind?
In fact he is present in many characters in Shararat. Whenever the
script was narrated, people instantly remembered him. Another character
that found her way into the script is the senile woman from Garam
Hawa, who refuses to leave her home during the Partition -- she
wasnt there from the start, but when I was writing the climax
she found her place in the film. I also remember the three old men
from Shaukeen who chase a young woman. I had to do something about
them. These people had to be included in the story.
Then came the
big question! How the hell does one get them all in one story? That
is when the idea struck about setting the entire story in an old
age home. That way, each of them could be accommodated along with
a few real ones like the yesteryear actress Shanta Apte who spent
her last years in an old age home forgotten by all.
It was easy,
a young brat (Abhishek Bachchan) who thinks the world revolves around
him, kind hearted parents (Romesh Sharma-Navni Parihar) who have
been unable to tame their boy, were all around to be used. There
were others like the DCP Bhosle (Om Puri), who is convinced about
the ill effects of western culture on the young generation, Judge
Murthy (Anjan Shrivastav) who wants recognition by the end of his
long career. And of course a young journalist Neha Sengupta (Hrishitaa
Bhat) who wants to change the world. All of them plot
to send the boy to an old age home as a punishment to become a better
human being.
All
set and ready to go
Rahul
reluctantly lands up in an old age home amidst all these people.
He is not worried -- if he is used to getting his way with his parents,
what can a few oldies do to him? But he is in for a
rude shock because these oldies are not what he has
expected. They are not his parents and there is no love lost between
them. After all he is not their grandson. He is just a common criminal
sent to serve them...
The
setting was right for a clash. It was Rahul against all these oldies
All easy, right?
Alas no! As soon as all those funny, strong willed people
went into the old age home they became morose and depressed. They
were too sad to react to the boy. I brooded for a long time. What
was the problem? What happened to my lively, passionate people?
How the hell was I going to complete the script? Where was the conflict,
the backbone of any story? I was also visiting old age homes at
that time to get the setting right. These visits too confirmed my
belief. Old age homes are sad places, people who live there
are sad people. If a young boy lands up there, they would
be too grateful for his company to trouble him. I saw my script
disappearing even before it was even written.
I kept up with my visits, nevertheless, and then it happened
One
day, an old lady greeted me as I entered. She had a big blue bindi
on her forehead. A blue bindi? Yes, doesnt
it look nice? I was bored of the same colour. She smiled a
toothless smile. What happened to the sad old woman... That was
the beginning. Another world was slowly opening in front of me.
Then my uncle
who had voluntarily decided to live in an old age home after the
death of his only son greeted me with words I can never forget.
"Good you came today. Last week was too hectic. We had too
many deaths to handle. You know how it is. There is too much work.
We have to call the relatives, get the bodies to the crematorium
and also sort out all the post death nitty-gritty. It was very tiresome.
But then some one has to do all this."
I gaped at
him. He enthusiastically ran every errand or organised all family
functions. He was the man who came into his elements only when there
was work. Of course, he always complained about the burden of responsibility
that he was forced to carry but this was going too far.
"Death means too much work?" What was my uncle in his
eighties thinking as he spoke about the work that the death of his
fellow residents brought? Where was the sadness that was supposed
to be all-engulfing and the tears of parting? I was sure I had got
it all wrong somewhere along the way. Old age and happiness? Old
age and life? Old age and toughness and being practical? I had not
heard that before. It was a moment. It was then that I realised
I was the problem, my glasses were tinted with too many preconceived
ideas as I looked at old people. Deep down, I believed that if you
are in an old age home then you have to be sad. That old people
cannot exist without their family. That being alone and lonely was
one and the same thing.
Thus Prajapati
(Amrish Puri) took form. He became the teacher. He told every one
that nothing changed because of the old age. "This is the golden
age without any responsibilities so enjoy it. You are free to live
as you want here. Welcome to Ashiyana." All the residents of
Ashiyana, the old age home of Shararat told everyone sternly not
to treat them as dead just because they were old. They were alive
and that was a good enough reason to be happy!
It was smooth
sailing once again. So now, armed with real people I was back on
track and so was the script. My job was done. I had to sit back
and enjoy the show. The boy was bored with them. He hated them.
They hated him back. He tried to create trouble and they set him
right. Prajapati woke him up at the crack of dawn and took him out
on morning walks. Rahul caused fights among them but they patched
up and made him feel small. He laughed at them when they enjoyed
the small pleasures of life. Slowly, a bond developed between them
- a bond that was strong enough to survive even after Rahuls
punishment was pardoned...
That is the
film, of course a lot was added in the process, a lot left out because
it was no longer fitting in. What never changed was the basic belief
that guided us through the entire process; around the time we decided
to make this film, I came across a quote from Paul Galico. "Everyone
and every thing in this story is fictitious. If, however, the characters
herein do not resemble someone you have encountered somewhere sometime,
then the author has failed to hold up a small mirror to life and
extends his regrets to one and all."
|
| |
| |
|
|
|