| |
Because
Sex does Sell!
Time
was when "A" grade films and the word "sex" were the most
abhorrent of horrors. Grandmas swooned
at the sight of a bared female knee, mothers covered their
children’s eyes at any bit of cleavage while nubile adolescents
and middle-aged gents peeked, and drooled...
WHEN
Rehana Sultan set the trend, with her shapely legs forming
an "A" on the posters of Do Raha, the south filmmakers
were quick to clamber onto the bandwagon. IV Sasi pioneered
the new "bold" rush with his Avalude Ravugal, which
had his future wife Seema oozing the lascivious, come-hither
look, and the front-benchers went hoarse whistling their lungs
out.
When you try something
that benefits society, and the coming generations, people
praise your efforts. But when it comes to investment,
few come forward. All my films are made on a shoestring
budget, with new faces, and even though I have sold them
for a song, those who bought them have raked in money.
And you know how they do it!
- Jacob Breeze |
An obscure starlet from Andhra named Vijayalakshmi graduated
from bit roles to be the first sex-bomb of the south screen.
Christened "Silk" Smitha (God alone knows for what
reason!) she charged a mind-boggling Rs 50,000 per call-sheet,
an astronomical sum those days, not even paid to leading heroines.
Of course, "Silk" ended up to her neck in debt,
and probably used a saree of the same sensuous material to
hang herself from her bedroom fan, and end her life too. But
thats another story. When she was at her peak, it was
sheer distributor pressure, which forced producers to sign
her for at least one dance sequence.
It happened that a director-friend from Kerala landed at my
house one morning, with his producer,, and wanted me to show
them her house. The producer, a crude, no-nonsense businessman,
grumbled all the way, casting an occasional glance at the
bag which contained the Rupees one lakh, which had to be paid
for the 2-day shooting schedule. "No artiste is worth
it," he kept on mumbling, "this is criminal!"
We land at Smithas house, and were told by the watchman
to wait, while he locked up the pet dogs. Meanwhile, a woman
with sleep-swollen eyes, and a dirty house-coat, with bedraggled
hair, peeped out of the door, and told us: "Just five
minutes!"
"Must be the servant," opined the producer, "she
could certainly use a bath!" I corrected him. "That
was Silk!" I told him. The producer had already leapt
into the car, bag and all. "Back to the hotel!"
he order the driver, "no way am I going to pay one lakh
for that!" True, Silk without the glamour of her make-up
was an unappetising sight, no doubt. But so disillusioned
was the producer, that he even flatly refused to make the
film, if having "that" was one of the conditions!
Then there was this director, who was the brain behind many
good films, and had earned the title of being a "class"
filmmaker in Malayalam. He had held many projections for likely
financiers and distributors. I was present at one such projection,
when a particularly waspish Marwadi financier was present.
He appeared quite disheartened that the film lacked "action"
(as he called it.) Of course, the "action" he wanted
was of the sexual type, and it was evident that no progress
would be made in the discussions unless he got what he wanted.
The only titillating part was the passionate meeting of two
lovers in a parked car. The director,, gentle and refined
soul that he was, had picturised this by a mild rocking of
the vehicle, which indicated an ethereal consummation of love.
"Not enough "action", protested the financier
vehemently, thumping his knee, "I want more!" The
poor director was forced to reshoot the scene, using two burly
stunt artistes, who sat together on the back seat behind the
blacked-out panes. When "Action!" was called, they
moved with such gusto, that the old Ambassador car soon resembled
a horse at a western rodeo, and nearly fell apart. But the
producer got his money!!
Hindi veteran Premnath was at his peak, when some of the scenes
for Johnny Mera Naam were shot in Madras. There was this torrid
dance scene with Padma Khanna, which had the eyeballs of the
oglers popping out. Kuch dam nahi hai! yelled the director,
and yet another "take" was called. The eccentric
Premnath (known for caprices like charging rates according
to the dates on which he signed an agreement), went all out
for the perfect seduction. He grabbed Padma in a bear-hug,
and after raining kisses all over her face, neck and forehead,
then started with her ears. After a while, the director gave
an enthusiastic "Wah! Wah" and ordered cut. The
heavily sweating Padma Khanna collapsed into a chair, even
as the director asked her: "Kaisa tha? How was it?"
"Boy!" she replied, "have you ever tried putting
your ear into a washing machine?"
It soon became the talk of the market that nothing would sell
in the Hindi market like good, lively, sex "action".
Among the dubbed films, it was the Telugu products with their
vigorous "jhatkas" and Kamasutra dance poses which
were first in demand. Then, came the "B" graders
in Malayalam and Tamil, with new faces, who never shed away
from the vitally necessary bedroom gymnastics.
The USP of these films were unquestionably the "bits".
These were shot with just the cameraman and director present,
along with the "artistes". Saucily uninhibited,,
they stopped at nothing, including full nudity and explicit
sex. (There was a theatre in Madras, now demolished, where
patrons could find written near the gate the precise timings,
when these "bits" would be screened). Producers
of such films always kept two albums of stills, one big one
for the censors and the "decent" distributors, and
another smaller one with the "action" stills for
the more demanding and unscrupulous ones!
One group of unfortunate victims of this new craze, were the
makers of genuine films on sex education. Avaricious and unprincipled
distributors rounded up a cameraman, and artistes willing
to go all the way. Bungalows were hired for the night in remote
locations for the shooting. Total silence was the rule, in
order not to attract unwelcome attraction. The male actors
were supplied with a few pegs to boost their libido, while
the rest had to be content with the ubiquitous packet of roadside
"biryani".
With UP, MP, Bihar and even Delhi becoming a flourishing market
for these films, true crusaders of the sex education genre
found themselves helpless to stem the rot. When police raided
theatres and seized these "bits" it was the producer
of the film who had to face the music. Says Jacob Breeze,
who has been an ardent crusader for proper sex education since
his school days. "There is no point fighting these people,
who have absolutely no scruples," he says, ruefully,
"and I also think a lot of the blame lies with the audience
as well, because they create the demand. And the funny part
is that the artistes participating, are not even in the original
cast! But the audience, especially the front-bencher, is more
than thrilled to see these forbidden, crudely-shot "bits!"
Breeze, who has over a dozen serious sex-education films to
his credit (he has written, produced, directed and acted in
most of them), is today a sad man. "When you try something
that benefits society, and the coming generations, people
praise your efforts. But when it comes to investment, few
come forward. All my films are made on a shoestring budget,
with new faces, and even though I have sold them for a song,
those who bought them have raked in money. And you know how
they do it!"
Breeze has long planned for a film titled Matha, Pitha, Guru,
Deivam!. It highlights the ancient Hindu tenets of equal respect
for parents, teacher and all elders. But there are no buyers
for the noble theme. "How is it possible?" he asks,
"I cant possibly erect stupendous sets, have glittering
costumes, or include expensive dances in foreign locales!
This will divert attention from what I want to say, this all-important
message for the younger generation. It is indeed a sad situation!"
We agree. But, beginning with Bob & Sally, that first
sex education film from Hollywood which flopped miserably
on the Indian screen, it is only sex of the explicit, brazen
kind, which will pull in the audiences. Maybe the trend has
changed a bit recently, with story, music, emotional performances
slowly tilting the scale, but sex, as raw as you can make
it, still wins out. As recent developments in Kerala have
shown.
A low-budget pot-boiler called Thoovaana Thumbikal (or something
like that) has broken all-time box-office records by mega-starrer
productions. The centre of attraction is a sultry, and slightly
frumpy heroine called Shakila, who has become one of the busiest
actresses in the Malayalam industry. She charges upto a lakh
of rupees a day, and her bedroom eyes and wholesome physique
have been a craze in Kerala. Needless to say, that almost
two dozen films are being canned, exploiting these voluptuous
assets as main selling points.
I dont rightly know if it was PT Barnum or Sam Goldwyn
who said: "Nothing sells like sex, and nothing sells
better than good sex!" But hes hit the nail smack
on the head.
Keep watching Indian movies, and youll agree with me!
V Shekhar
TOP
|
More>>>
Londoner
turns to Mumbai stars for style
NEW
LOOK NANDAN GREETS THE EYE, AS...
Sixth Calcutta fest
gets underway
|