MBT shoes
by MBT shoes sale on 2009-12-22 17:56:40.086407+05:30 As you know when our social develop fast, and more and more people seek in peraonal health, more and more people would like to make a climb or do sports, yes,health is improtant, and now walking shoes is loved by most people, you can see the MBT walking shoes. so a new styles for health. and to get more people know the inportance of health. you can see MBT sale shoes now. this is a chance to get the MBT shoes UK. we all get a MBT M.WALK shoes.
Reply | Forward
UGGS on Sale
by UGGS on Sale on 2009-12-10 17:22:53.895237+05:30 Do you like
Cheap UGG Classic Mini.
It seems to be warm and advanced which is suitable in the cold days.It is released from
Classic Short UGG Boots on Sale.They are all
UGG Boots Sale.No matter which one you like most,both are worthwhile.Not missed.
Reply | Forward
ugg boots uk
by ugg boots uk on 2009-10-10 12:57:36.312041+05:30 Shoes of a person outside the United States a direct reflection of the good interpersonal relationships in people wearing matching is very important, and he affect your eyes in the audience the first impression. ugg boots uk gives the show is not only your shoes, but your temperament, self-cultivation. Shoes to wear clothing with their own sense of taste. ugg boots online with many people's attention gradually become hot spots, firmly believed that his vision is consistent with the logic of the public, select the ugg boots uk showed off your hot spots.
Reply | Forward
Religion and its prophets don't always deserve the respect they command
by Jas on 2009-08-18 17:47:52.433433+05:30 I really don't know what SRK said about Islam and prophet. The fact that so many absolute idots/believers are so outraged, shows me he must have said something very sensible. More people should have wisdom and courage to criticize religion and its prophets/gods.
Reply | Forward
he should wait for day of judgmenet.
by Tufail Jaffri on 2009-08-15 22:30:55.700353+05:30 Dear Fellows, I guess, there may be some misinterpretation.What i know is that Shahrukh him self is a Muslim by birth, and i think he can not be that stupid so he can speak something wrong about Islam or Holy Prophet.Since i know him, or i have heard many of his interviews, i feel he is a very good person him self. Who can't event hurt a single person, so it shard for me to believe that he has given such a statement which can hurt the believers of a religion he himself is part of.If he has committed this sin, i believe, he must pay for it in this world , and should wait for the Roz-e- Qayamat for this act as well.And if the statement is due to mistake from Magazine, being Muslim, he must take action against the magazine to prove his truth, and punish these stupid magazines people.
Reply | Forward
hu
by huma on 2009-07-26 20:29:43.507111+05:30 i believe in shahrukh, there is some misinterpretation. i trust him and i believe he can never do anything so mean... if u ppl liked shahrukh, then u should trust him.... hopeless junk of fools.
Reply | Forward
Officer
by Syed Waqas on 2009-07-21 09:39:17.162267+05:30 SRK was my favourite but he is no more important for me after his statement. I strongly CONDEMNED his words. He has no right to say anything about ISLAM. His knowledge about ISLAM is nothing. We all are very grieved and unhappy. Now I would change channel in which SRK is seen..
Reply | Forward
1 srk
by DEVIL on 2009-08-02 04:41:54.265664+05:30What about the painter who painted hidu goddesses naked.please don't overreact
Reply | Forward
1 This Religion is problem
by jas on 2009-08-18 17:23:33.114691+05:30Why no body can have any opinion and express it about Islam and the so called prophet? As long as Muslims remain this close minded, ignorant and bigoted, no one will have any respect for them and they will remain backward and a real drag to world peace and progress.
Reply | Forward
1 No-No
by manawwar roshan on 2009-08-22 22:17:54.065503+05:30It's becoz' Islam was brought to the people by our Holy Prohphet PBUH.In essence, Islam means 'submission' (to the will of God). And is a very peaceful religion.Anything said against the Holy Prophet PBUH who brought this message of salvation to Mankind is against the very basic belief of Muslims.It does not mean Muslims are close-minded. For a moment - let's talk about Hinduism, or Christianity and discuss stupid ideas about these religions - will the Hindus or Christians keep quiet? No.Fact is - my friend that a religion is a way of life. To build character, moral strength and perfect an imperfect being.This calls for mature discussions and not a 'he said, she said' kind of arguments.
Reply | Forward
1 about religions
by nice on 2009-11-19 19:44:43.784152+05:30good 2 straigten up
Reply | Forward
sharukh khan talk about the Islam he knows nothing about that
by predeep on 2009-07-12 10:41:10.586361+05:30 sharukh khan is edieat person he is no right to tell any religion is wrong and right words in the society, he did not know about Islam he is not a perfect religioes leader or. If the man born on the earth thier should be some reposiblity for him. He should give repect to elder and childreds and in the society he should live in honest way and live with helping nature to all the society.The main part of BURQA for ladies is compulsary, it should protect them for seeing other people by teasing any others. if it banned thier should be no secuity to ladies and it is every it seen rape acid attack and love stories for that The Islam believing people take rules to wear a BURQA. The use lees fellow sharukh khan not known of this fact thier should differnce in real life realist life and it say sorry to on before of ALLAH in masjid. it is better to in his life and life of after death and in future it should not reapeat the same. The Islam loving people have chance to murder at time
Reply | Forward
SRK kafrana remarks
by Sadiq Ullah on 2009-07-08 12:54:59.021249+05:30 I condemned the remarks of shah rukh made agains our beloved Porphet Muhammad(PBUH). Too much popularity and wealth has detoriarated his mind. What is his status to comment against the Prophet. I personally now do not see his film and forwith whenever he is seen in picture. I realy hate him and want his downfall.
Reply | Forward
Shahrukh Khan statement
by Mohammad Mutasim on 2009-07-02 14:35:32.808006+05:30 I dont like shahrukh khan,if shahrukh statement is wrong i like them, otherwise we will treat to him lik a dog
Reply | Forward
1 sharukh khan statement
by namisha on 2009-07-02 17:25:20.888617+05:30ok i like your feelings that u tell every thing openly but sometimes we are not able to understand that what is right and what is wrong.so if you like my thought,than i suggest you that you should first understand all thing and than gave your opinion about sharukh.
Reply | Forward
so sham full srk
by amna on 2009-07-02 13:28:18.390298+05:30 if he made nay typo comment abput our Prophet Mohammed(s.w.s) then he should not say him slef muslim ne more.....if not then he should come and say in front of meida and should punish that newspaper men....
Reply | Forward
We believe in living in peaceful harmony...
by rauf on 2009-06-28 15:19:58.285069+05:30 There is a great number of people who belong to minority esp. in Sindh there is a great majority of Hindu Sindhis living in this part of the world. they are living a happy and prosperous life in Pakistan. We donot trample pitches of the cricket stadium's here.
Reply | Forward
unbeliveable
by ghaffar on 2009-06-27 17:54:08.892163+05:30 sharukh khan is muslim beacause he jst born in a muslim house.he dnt know about islam(religon of piece).us ka beta pehly mandir or phir masjid jata hy....what is this????
Reply | Forward
1 "Religion of piece"
by Village Boy on 2009-08-18 17:33:18.209555+05:30Ghaffar Bhai you mean "religion of pieces" (of infidels), I am sure. And can't agree with you more.
Reply | Forward
Srk comment
by Sbk on 2009-06-27 16:17:11.771774+05:30 Mr reddy u know nothing of islam..n making false allegation...u know little knowledge is too dangerous..what u know abt ur relgion that hindusm...what is shiv ling...krisna ke leela with all girl in brindawan...n what abt ram what he did to his wife...n what indar that world famous playboy...u well what did shankar did in lust that he beheaded his...is what ur all god do...it like so uncivilize....no scietific proof...full doubts...
Reply | Forward
Comment
by Sajid on 2009-06-27 14:06:08.725161+05:30 ShahRukh Khan is not a Muslim? He is not able to be said Muslim?In fact He is a Person Who has nothing any relegion. Nothing any Emotions about the others feeling. He just want to himself. Actually He is very rude man in his personal life
Reply | Forward
Roz-e-Qayamat
by NaimatUllah on 2009-06-26 12:30:42.215688+05:30 i believe that a muslim like sharokh khan well pay the price on Roz-e-Qayamat from Allah
Reply | Forward
Reaction
by Saqib on 2009-06-25 16:06:07.858437+05:30 I don't know the truth but being a muslim by birth such comparison doesn't toleratable. Shahrukh is muslim by birth as well. He must realise the punishment at Roz-e-Qayamat.
Reply | Forward
lets not believe what we are made to believe
by mahjabeen ali on 2009-06-25 14:08:26.176351+05:30 well i dont think that such a famous personality like shahrukh khan who is loved by people from all races would say something as malicious as alleged because this might jeoperdise his career and he being a person who calculates every step before taking it cannot do so. it should also be noticed that this can also be done by his rivals as he is very much liked by all and earlier too there have been attempts by politicians to attack his image.
Reply | Forward
Product of secularsim
by Ghulam ali on 2009-06-25 09:01:45.212097+05:30 Whetever expressed by Shah Rukh , must be probed, if he is found guilty he should be punished as per Indian constitution. His personal life symbolises non-muslim attitude but being a son of muslim parents he atleast should have followed the minimum values of islam.
Reply | Forward
shaarokaa
by sharookaa on 2009-06-25 00:17:21.208026+05:30 HI ALL HERE VOTE SHAROOKAA MANY TIMES AND GIVE HIM ROSE PLEASEhttp://connect.in.com/profile/vote/Shah_Rukh_Khan/287
Reply | Forward
srk shame on you
by sam on 2009-06-24 20:03:18.476959+05:30 I don't know the truth, but SRK should really tell the truth!! He acts and behaves like a non-muslim anyway, so i would not be suprised if he did say those vulgar words towards the prophet (pbuh)
Reply | Forward
shame on shahrukh khan
by umbreen on 2009-06-24 17:48:05.984259+05:30 sharukh khan should ask sorry from muslim through media.
Reply | Forward
ITS SHAMFUL
by HAJI ALIASS on 2009-06-24 17:18:44.217759+05:30 JUNE 24, 2009IT IS A SHAMEFUL APTITUDE DID BY SHAHRUKH KHAN. WE ALL PAKISTANI PEOPLE AND SPECIALLY MUSLIM IN THE WORLD DID NOT EXPECT SUCH THINGS FROM THIS SUPER STAR.WE URGE AUTHORITIES TO PUT WHATEVER MAXIMUM PUNISHMENT WHICH IS POSSIBLE UNDER THE LAW AND RULES AND REGULATIONS.BEST REGARDSHAJI ALIASSKARACHIPAKISTAN
Reply | Forward
COMMENTS AGAINST PROPHET
by AYAZ BACHA on 2009-06-24 16:52:58.479843+05:30 IF SHAH RUKH REALY DO IT SO THE ONLY PUNISHMENT FOR HIM IS DEATH SENTENCE
Reply | Forward
Comments SRK about Muhammad (PBUH)
by Khalid Chandio on 2009-06-23 14:58:52.46231+05:30 This is first time that people are saying all about this for Shah Rukh Khan but infact he is not a Muslim. He has a mandir in his home than how he is muslim. I don't mean to say any thing wrong about the other religions they are respectable for Muslims but I mean, if some one is Hindu he must follow the Rules
Reply | Forward
shahrukh's comments
by yasir on 2009-06-23 13:32:28.461594+05:30 It is time to do something with stupid people like shahrukh khan, I believe that a muslim who is passing such comments should not killed but put in jail and should not allow to see anybody or light...........
Reply | Forward
SRK comment
by Farhana Rana on 2009-06-23 05:05:45.63474+05:30 Salam..SRK said dat his hateful comment is a printing error, but if itz not a printing error in reality, he'll gonna pay 4 it 4 sure, 'cause ALLAH knows everything as HE is ALL-HEARING, ALL-KNOWING.
Reply | Forward
SRK comment
by Farhana Rana on 2009-06-23 05:01:13.297719+05:30 Salam...As SRK said dat itz a printing error
Reply | Forward
There is no compulsion in religion, but no one should insult
by suralisheikh on 2009-06-23 04:06:41.239322+05:30 Many readers commenting here totally misunderstand the issue. It is not a question of tolerance or freedom of speech. Take a hard core, real fundamentalist Marxist Communist( Jyoti Basu, Anil Biswan and Buddhadeb have not fully reached that distinction, more than these leaders) and if he says the free market economy without any Govt. intervention is the best, what would you think of him. He is a lunatic, he is a traitor, has renounced the association of Communism. Same thing. Islam is an Association and it has its God given constitution called the Qur’an. It is up to Shahrukh or any Muslim to declare the formula and accept the principles at least in theory or leave the Association and declare that he is a free thinker, or an atheist or Communist or a Hindu (if Hinduism allows what some of the readers say) or whatever. We do not want Shahrukh and his ilk to keep the cake and eat it too.The choice is his. The Qur’an says “There is no compulsion in religion”
Reply | Forward
skr statement
by khushiali on 2009-06-22 21:57:05.844032+05:30 shame on yourself shahrukh khan just a bloody acter you r
Reply | Forward
SRK IS NOT MUSLIM
by ALI on 2009-06-22 21:50:06.045919+05:30 U R NOT KAHN U R NOT MUSLIM U R NOTHING
Reply | Forward
MUHAMMAD(PBUH)
by naeem on 2009-06-22 21:47:20.734286+05:30 SRK HAVE NO RIGHTS TO SAY WRONG ABOUT MUHAMMAD(PBUH) MAIN SRK KO LIKE KARTA THA AS ACTOR BUT NOW I HATE 2 MUCH WITH SHARUKH IF U SAID WRONG ABOUT OUR PROPHET IN THIS CAUSE U R NOT MUSLIM U SHOULD SAY SORRY 2 OUR PROPHET AND 2 OUR ALLAHA THEN MAY B ALLAHA AND MUHAMMAD (PBUH) MAY FORGIVE U AND RRK U SHOULD DOBARA ISLAAM JOIN KARO
Reply | Forward
SRK STATEMENT
by Mohammed on 2009-06-22 17:22:47.475124+05:30 Sharukh have no rights to talk about Islam or the prophet because He doesn’t follow the Islam and the Prophet He is Just an Actor. If he told this words of comparison about Prophet means he has to pay for it in this world and after the death as well but if he didn’t say any thing bad but someone make the rumors means they have to keep in there mind one thing our prophet Mohammed Mustafa (Sallallahu Alaihi wasallam) is after Allah JallaJalalahu and know one in this world on universe to compare with him. And some want to say some unreligious people says something about the Islam or the Prophet means they are splitting on the sky and the result they know.
Reply | Forward
prophet muhammad(p.b.u.h)
by usman on 2009-06-22 14:57:40.970501+05:30 if he has said that then he is absolutely wrong and should not have done this
Reply | Forward
Consensus of Muslims
by Abdullah on 2009-06-22 14:15:12.357932+05:30 If he has made such comment deliberately or undeliberately then according to consensus he has disbelieved
Reply | Forward
Shahrukh Can not have the cake and eat it too
by suralisheikh on 2009-06-22 13:34:03.01469+05:30 Many readers commenting here totally misunderstand the issue. It is not a question of tolerance or freedom of speech. Take a hard core, real fundamentalist Marxist Communist( Jyoti Basu, Anil Biswan and Buddhadeb have not fully reached that distinction, more than these leaders) and if he says the free market economy without any Govt. intervention is the best, what would you think of him. He is a lunatic, he is a traitor, has renounced the association of Communism. Same thing. Islam is an Association and it has its God given constitution called the Qur’an. It is up to Shahrukhan or any Muslim to declare the formula and accept the principles at least in theory or leave the Association and declare that he is a free thinker, or an atheist or Communist or a Hindu (if Hinduism allows what some of the readers say) or whatever. We do not want Shahrukhan and his ilk to keep the cake and eat it too.The choice is his. The Qur’an says “There is no compulsion in religion”
Reply | Forward
Apologise Tone !!
by Hidayat Khan on 2009-06-22 10:06:57.23852+05:30 If Shahrukh himself admitting that he has not said anything and his recent statement about Prophet Mohammad (P.B.U.H) that “there is no more important figure in history than Prophet Mohammad, Being a Muslim and standing up for the tenets of Islam is my most important agenda" should stop all controversies. I think Indian muslims are now mature enough to judge what shall hurt religious sentiments.
Reply | Forward
Regious Comment Controversy of Shah Rukh Khan
by Rameshwar Singh on 2009-06-22 06:50:24.899045+05:30 Indian law against 'the hate speech' goes too far and severely restricts the freedom of speech. People who may make truthful statement on a religion they will be charged. For example, if two quotations are offered from Quran, which show contradiction is punishable under the Indian law. This is against the spirit of democracy. It should be amemded.
Reply | Forward
y so serious!!?
by tayana on 2009-06-22 04:17:10.445053+05:30 The dude is an ACTOR...stop taking him so seriously! SRK has always said that he is no scholar on religion. His practices might not be in line with straight-laced hindus or muslims, but what is it to you what he practices? That's up to him and God alone. In any case, he is always advocating for respect for all beliefs, regardless of what your faith may be. I think that's a great thing, and a great message to take home whoever you are.
Reply | Forward
CHILD PSYCHOLOGIST,CARDIFF,UK
by SAVITRI NIRAJANUJ on 2009-06-21 23:06:50.528308+05:30 I READ COMMENTS BY NAYAN.HE IS SATYAVAN.TODAY IS FATHER'S DAY AND TRUE FATHER IN ANY RELIGION IS GOD-EXTENSION OF BRAHMA AT DIFFERENT TIME/NAME/PLACE(ALL IN ASIA-4 IN INDIA WITHOUT SWORD).OUR OWN BEATTLES-GEORGE HARRISON AND GANG-IN UK CAME TO INDIA AND UNDERSTOOD THE DEPTH,COMPEXITY WITH UTTER SIMPLICITY OF HINDUISM AND WROTE THIS SONG.......'WE WANT TO SEE YOU,IT TAKES SO LONG TIME.HARE RAAMAAA,HARE KRISHNA.......GURU BRAHMA,GURU VISHNU,GURU DEVO MAHESHVARA.I WILL LISTEN TO BEATTLES CD 'GURU BRAHMA' ON FATHER'S(ALL GODS) DAY WITH MY TWO SONS NIRAJ/ANUJ BORN ON GOKUL ASHTAMI/RAM NAVMI.TRUST ME THAT BATTLES DID NOT WRITE AND SANG THIS SONG UNDER THREAT OF SWORD.ALL GODS ARE GREAT.TO ERR IS DIVINE AND TO FORGIVE IS HUMAN.GOD CREATED (IN ERROR) FOLLOWERS OF GOD WHO ARE NOT AS PERFECT AS GOD AND THATS WHY WE HAVE RXTREMISTS IN ALL RELIGIONS-REPEAT-ALL RELIGIONS.ANY WHERE EXTREMISTS ARE IN LARGE NUMBERS INSTEAD OF EXCEPTION ARE DANGEROUS NEANDERTHALS/DODOS
Reply | Forward
CONSULTANT AMEURASIA/INDIA
by NAYAN M.DESAI on 2009-06-21 20:45:49.240106+05:30 NEANDARTHAL MET THE FATE OF DODO OF MADAGASCAR.THAT WAS THE FIRST SAMPLE-HUMAN LIKE-DECENDED FROM OUR PRIMATE FOREFATHERS.HOMO ERECTUS CAME UPON THE SCENE(EVE/ADAM?)LATER ON WHO HAD MORE INTELLIGENCE TO SURVIVE THAN NEANDERTHALS.THEN THEY SPREAD OUT IN WORLD FROM HIGHLANDS OF ETHIOPIA AND GREAT RIFT VALLEY OF KENYA AND BECAME WHITE,BLACK,BROWN,YELLOW RACE.MOST INTELLIGENT TRIBE SETTLED IN HINDUS(INDUS) RIVER VALLEY/PUNJAB-5 RIVERS- AND GANGETIC PLAIN. A CLASSICAL HINDU VEDIC CIVILISATION TOOK ROOTS WHICH IS 75% OF INDIA'S POPULATION.HINDUISM,BUDHDHISM,JAINISM,SIKHISM NEVER SPREAD ON SWORDS.MANTRA-SHLOK APTLY DESCRIBES FIRST MOST IMPORTANT GOD OF CIVILISED HUMANS WHEN WORLD WAS BACKWARD.'GURU BRAHMA,GURU VISHNU,GURU DEVO MAHESHVARA,..'EVERY ONE KNOWS..YADA YADA HI DHARMASYA...ABHYUHANAM DHAMASYA TADA ATMANAM SRUJAMYAM. MOST IMPORTANT GOD BRAHMA CAME BACK AS GOD OF ALL RELIGIONS .ALL GODS TRUE, BUT FOLLOWERS WITH SWORDS ARE NEANDERTHALS.GODISNOWHERE..BREAK UP WITH NOW/NO.
Reply | Forward
NO MIND
by SMAMG on 2009-06-21 18:23:01.000298+05:30 JUST YOU KEEP MUSLIM NAME DOES NOT MEAN YOU ARE MUSLIM AND SHAHRUKH KAHN IS NOT MUSLIM. LIKE MANY HINDU WOMEN WEAR BURKHA AND DO BAD THINGS TO SPOIL THE NAME.. YES MR ROHIT IS RIGHT WE SHOULD WHIPPED , LASHED
Reply | Forward
shahrukh's rude language
by jaffer on 2009-06-21 17:44:28.484578+05:30 shshrukh is noy worthy of speeking about the religion that he doesn't profess in practice.He is much far from the teachings of islam or any other religion.He is just a hypocrite and worships the fame and vanity.
Reply | Forward
1 rude language?
by Don on 2009-06-22 03:50:41.830686+05:30yes he is far coz he dosen't tot a AK 47 and blow people like u losers....
Reply | Forward
Prophet comment controversy: SRK says 'writing error'
by John Slanders on 2009-06-21 16:56:37.941831+05:30 He has got to have his head read.Jesus Christ is way beyond his thinking. Just compare his thinking to Mathma Gandhi and he will feel foolish, humiliated and destroyed. Not only that, even the Hindu Gods, the Buddhist Gods and the Shinto Gods and ANY God, will look at him as a fool. He IS one.
Reply | Forward
SRK-ISALM-PROPHET...............
by shekhar on 2009-06-21 15:17:49.061705+05:30 Guys why whenever there is a relegious issue, all chat sites, and article comments sites, get filled with filthy relegious banter and cross talks. Though I admit, there are good discussions and points which comes accross, but always there is the usual spikes against relegions. For me I am still steadfast in believing SRK did not say anything against the prophet. Yes he probably had his mind thinking faster than his words were coming out, and in trying to keep up he mentioned the prophet's name in the same breath. However that does not make him anti muslim, perharps a bit careless, which should be treated differently. As for the rest of us, stick to the point, talk abt the matter, and dont go over or under board,and put relegion in the firing line. One love, One India, relegious unity, and Truth prosperity
Reply | Forward
What about Sonia?
by Arvind on 2009-06-21 12:55:37.27628+05:30 Congress Government submitted an affidavit in Supreme Court questioning the exitence of Ram. Our hindu population overwhelmingly voted for them. Looks like hindus do not have respect for their prophets.
Reply | Forward
1 Because some of them use their brains
by Jas on 2009-08-18 18:12:19.257385+05:30 But Hindus with the exception of RRSites, seem to have brain in their heads and most of them seem to use it too to think for themselves. And that is more important than any respect for any religion.
Reply | Forward
Nuisance!
by am on 2009-06-21 11:43:45.041582+05:30 What is this nuisance going on? If he believes in something, it is his right to believe. If other (protesters) believe in something else, it is their right to believe in whatever. Why is hurting sentiments come over here? Why such a nuisance?
Reply | Forward
Prophet comment controversy
by N.V.SANKARAN on 2009-06-21 10:57:23.223604+05:30 This is not surprising in India. India is the first country in the world to ban Salman Rushdie's "Satanic Verses" and has found nothing wrong in M.F.Hussain's vulgar nude paintings of Hindu goddesses and Bharat Mata. When Hindus objected to Hussain's controversial paintings, even the courts pronounced that it was his artistic freedom of expression.
Reply | Forward
Reply to NRI Engineer
by V.Ramachandra Reddy on 2009-06-21 10:10:46.335399+05:30 Mr. NRI Engineers comments reflect his uncivilized nature. He accuses Hindu pilgrims as prostitutes. Well done Mr.Engineer, that is why you covered your women in burqahs so that they look like ghosts. You raised the issue of Sati. Hindu women started practicing Sati to protect themselves from Islamic rapist invaders in the middle ages. Have u read about any Sati incidents after Roop Kanwar's case? You even wrote about equality by raising the issue of Shankaracharya. Yes in your religion there is so much of equality. Look at pakistan, Afghanistan and Iraq- all are equal, but see how they are satisfying their blood lust by exterminating each other. Let me quote from Koran.Koran 9:29: "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued."
Reply | Forward
ALL RELIGIONS TEACH TOLERATION AND GOOD BEHAVIOUR.
by B S GANESH on 2009-06-21 09:58:28.448197+05:30 ALL RELIGIONS ARE INANIMATE OBJECTS TEACHING TOLERATION, GOOD BEHAVIOUR, DISCIPLINE AND GOOD GOVERNANCE. BUT ONLY THOSE WHO PROFESS THEY ARE THE PROTECTORS OF RELIGION HAVE TO GET REFORMED TO ACCEPT THE PREACHINGS OF THE RELIGION. DESTRUCTION OF LIVES AND PROPERTY IN TBE NAME OF PROTECTING RELIGION IS BAD AND SUCH PEOPLE REQUIRE GOOD SERMONS.B S GANESH
Reply | Forward
Reply to Younus Bashoeb. Know about your religion.
by V.Ramachandra Reddy on 2009-06-21 09:49:18.164404+05:30 Koran 9:29: "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued." "The women of these disobedient infidels would be enslaved and raped according to [an Islamic ritual] Mut’a," "Fight in the name of Allah and in the way of Allah. Fight against those who disbelieve in Allah. Make a holy war...When you meet your enemies who are polytheists, invite them to three courses of action. If they respond to any one of these, you also accept it and withhold yourself from doing them any harm. Invite them to (accept) Islam; if they respond to you, accept it from them and desist from fighting against them....If they refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the Jizya. If they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off your hands. If they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah's help and fight them."(Sahih Muslim 4294)
Reply | Forward
Reply to Younus Bashoeb :Know about your religion first!
by V.Ramachandra Reddy on 2009-06-21 09:34:20.291609+05:30 Younus accused me of lacking the knowledge of History. Leave about India where Hindus had the advantage of overwhelming numbers and even Akbar befriended Hindus to rule the country as he realized the imp. of their support. But Aurangazed imposed Jizya and tore down scores of Temples. What happend to 10%of Hindus in Pakistan after partition? Religious cleasing! What is happening to Sikhs in Pak and Afghan border? Leave or pay Jizya otherwise get ready to die -exactly how it was stated in Hadith. Younus also accused me of misquoting. Let me do some more quoting for his benifit.Volume 1, Book 2, Number 24:Allah's Apostle said: "I have been ordered (by Allah) to fight against the people until they testify that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that Muhammad is Allah's Apostle, and offer the prayers perfectly and give the obligatory charity, so if they perform at that, then they save their lives and property from me except for Islamic laws and then their reckoning....
Reply | Forward
Freedom of Expression
by Joshi on 2009-06-21 09:04:04.284643+05:30 Though I dont agree with what Mr Shahrukh Khan allegedly has said about prophet( Which he has denied),I want to know , what has happened to freedom of expression.Why was no FIR was logded against MF Hussian,why every one protested when His insulting paintings were opposed and people opposing were branded as Fanatics.....Just a thought for Pseudos
Reply | Forward
Secular democray - India
by Sam on 2009-06-21 05:08:01.51572+05:30 Shahrukh Khan has the right to say anything - that right is given by secular constitution of INdia. The demonstrators have the right to oppose and feel hurt and burn effigies - that right is given by the secular constitution of India.Shahrukh Khan is the handful of true Muslims...who really understand the Islam religion.To the protestors : Is Islam so feeble and weak that some comments by Shahrukh Khan will cause damage to it ??To all Muslims - please be more tolerant. Practice Islam in any form in your own personal life. Do not impose your religious "rights and wrongs" on others.How are these protestors different from crazy Raj Thackeray and his gang... ?
Reply | Forward
Reply to Mr. Younus Bashoeb:
by Kamal on 2009-06-21 04:46:51.39561+05:30 There are so many non Islamic Secular countries like UK, Netherlands, Sweden, India, Russia, Thailand etc etc, who are facing the Islamic Extremism is more than sufficient proof to show the compatibility and tolerance of Islam at ground level.Regarding the Indian History, You should read it again from some unbiased source and for your info Muslim had never ruled all the parts of India at any point of time. Read it from some reliable source or Simply search ‘distortion-of-indian-history-for-muslim-appeasement’ on the google search, it will be an eye opener for any Common Indian or any Historian.
Reply | Forward
Only Allah ist perfect!
by Nigin on 2009-06-21 02:36:20.424406+05:30 I have started thankfully King Khan to be interested in Indian culture, to understand them and to love. When I have been in the very bad situation, he has given me to the life strength again. During the consideration of his curriculum vitae my faith in God has increased. So, I simply do not believe all these stupid things. This have made only SRK Hater, and the silly people believe everything what they hear, because they are not able to consider independently, and do not own her own opinion. I pray to the God that those come as quick as possible to the reason who him want to get to the problems. And I recite ALLAH to protect Him and his family. He is even a PERSON, how all the others. The people who express themselves at the moment on him badly should consider whether they themselves really pursue everything what to itself, actually, Islam points to. Above all jemaden owe without knowing certainly about it, is quite big sin, now so comes to the reason and prays for your sin. If SRK is really guilty, is only Allah is to be punished responsibly him.
Reply | Forward
Is this India or Pakistan?
by kapleap on 2009-06-20 22:32:47.568742+05:30 Is this India or Pakistan? Are we not free to express out opinion? This is a non-secular country for a reason. Are we now banning Rushdie's and Nasrin's again in our country?
Reply | Forward
1 Blasphemy
by Syed on 2009-06-23 00:26:09.953043+05:30If Shah Rukh's 2nd statment that "there is no more important figure in history than Prophet Mohammad. "Being a Muslim and standing up for the tenets of Islam is my most important agenda" then he should file a case against the magzine who published the wrong thing about him and his wording, he can file a suite against that magazine.
Reply | Forward
freedom of thought and speech
by ramesh kumar on 2009-06-20 20:28:29.6834+05:30 The religion was spread with the sword. The survival of hinduism is due to its own. In Iran or persia when the muslims invaded to the luck of india few of the zorastrians migrated to India , they are the parsis.They still practice their religion and also have contributed to the indian economy. They are the tatas and the godrej wadias.On the other hand the zorastrians or parsis who remained in Iran were forcibly converted or massacred.Even in egypt the civilisation which built the beautiful pyramids were destroyed at the sword point. Today even both the egypt and iran are in constant struggle. It is to research and try to revive all the forms of free thinking that were in the world, so people can stop killing each other.
Reply | Forward
Peace Creatures
by Roit on 2009-06-20 19:38:47.195135+05:30 Peace creatures why use medicines, arms of Christians? Fight with book which is most powerful.
Reply | Forward
Brothers PUBHU
by rohit on 2009-06-20 19:34:15.309573+05:30 Insane Bros... Do not ampute organ. Hating own body not good.
Reply | Forward
1 SRK Statement
by Mohammed on 2009-06-22 16:10:41.801366+05:30Sharukh have no rights to tell about Islam or our Prophet becuase he dont follow Islam and Prophet OK he is just a person who take money and dance on screen or stage If he told this words it means he has to pay for it in this world and after his death as well. If he did not compare prophet with some and some one blaming him they have to understand that no one in the universal can reduce his love and respect from Mulims heart because he is after Allah and no one in the worlds to compare with if you did means. Its like you split on Sky and and the result you know very well Some unrelegious people who is not a perfect muslim can only do this work.
Reply | Forward
Fundamental Right...
by sachin kadtan on 2009-06-20 18:44:00.466391+05:30 Right to speak is fundamental right!
Reply | Forward
HANGED TILL DEATH
by SHAIKH MEENAZ AHMED on 2009-06-20 17:58:03.891407+05:30 WE SHOULD HANGED THE PERSON IN THE STREET WHO TALK NON SENCE ABOUT ANY RELIGION........... AND SHARUKH KHAN WHAT SHOULD WE SAY ABOUT HIM............. HE IS DISGUSTING TO THE SOCIETY.........WHAT HE THINK ABOUT HIMSELF.......HE HAVE MONEY...........AND HE IS ABOVE ANY LAW........ HE SHOULD SHUP UP HIS DIRTY MOUTH. THE GOVERMENT OF INDIA SHOULD PASSED STRICT LAW FOR THOSE PEOPLE WHO TALK NONSENCE ABOUT ANY RELIGION AND THEY SHOULD GET VERY HARSH PUNISHMENT.
Reply | Forward
All Hail Hero
by rohita on 2009-06-20 17:39:08.416223+05:30 What is wrong if someone says anything against originator of satanic verses? People should in fact hail Salman Rushdie.
Reply | Forward
Let Law Prevail
by Roht on 2009-06-20 17:27:28.921408+05:30 These demonstrating demons should be whipped, lashed and jailed. Shah Rukh is a decent person and has dome nothing wrong.
Reply | Forward
SRK
by AN on 2009-06-20 16:28:57.134114+05:30 What else do Muslims know apart from taking out fatwas
Reply | Forward
Reply to Mr. V. Ramachandra Reddy
by Younus Bashoeb on 2009-06-20 15:33:01.644979+05:30 I am amazed by the views expressed by Mr. Reddy. He projects Islam as most intolerent religion. It seems Mr. Reddy lacks knowledge of history. Let me say one thing to him, if at all what he expresses is true; then Mr. Reddy himself would not have been Mr. Reddy, and he himself is the symbol of Islam's intolerence and inclusive nature. Muslims ruled the subcontinent for eight centuries, and today we proudly have 80 crores hindus in India. I think this is the biggest proof of what Islam is. Like wise, Egypt, Syria, Iraq and many more countries which are under muslim rule enjoys a 12-15% christian population among them, and they are happily living for centuries. And finally, Mr. Reddy misquotes Quran and Hadith. Turning to Sharukh khan, its immeterial to muslims what sharukh says and what sharukh thinks about Islam and the Prophet.
Reply | Forward
The religion which always proves Marx true.
by V.Ramachandra Reddy on 2009-06-20 14:28:14.515687+05:30 This is precisely the kind of attitude which made Islam the most intolerant religion in the world. If ever this world gets destroyed it would be because of Islam. I wonder why do they think about their religion 24 hours, 4 weeks, and 365 days. If they don't mend their ways they will pay the price for their intolerance. Though I'm a non-Muslim I read Koran and Shahi Bukhari(Hadith). While I was reading those books I felt as if i was being taken to the middle ages where goons would go on killing spree and lusty men with multiple wives treating women as their products. Prophet Mohammad himself married Aiyesha at the age of nine and not only that, he even lusted his own daughter-in-law and married her. There are innumerable references to jihad and Islamic scriptures are full of violence, and exploitation of women.In any Muslim country if there are any non Muslims they kill them, otherwise they fight among themselves and die to satisfy their thirst for blood. for them religion is real opium
Reply | Forward
1 Re: Marx
by abbas on 2009-06-22 04:08:25.249088+05:30For your info, Prophet Mohammed(PBUH)had no sons, so there is no truth in your baseless and filthy allegation about lust.
Reply | Forward
Comments on Sharukhs comments
by Zakir Husain on 2009-06-20 14:18:37.912501+05:30 Being a muslim he cannot use just our prophets name along with that he has to add Sallalu Alaiwa Sallam (Peace and blessing of Allah be upon him)after our prophets name. Being a muslim that too well known star of world he should use the opportunity to appreciate islam.I think he has taken our prophet for granted, that he should not do it for the sake of entire mankind.
Reply | Forward
Double standards
by RM on 2009-06-20 14:09:27.211724+05:30 Anyone is free to take a mick out of Ram or Krishn, but no one is allowed to even speak about Muhammad. Are these not double standards?
Reply | Forward
SRK and Prophet
by ramkesav on 2009-06-20 14:00:09.163225+05:30 So much hue and cry about SRK's alleged comments on Prophet Mohamed. A case is even filed. But what about the DMK and the DK which have been doing anti Hindu probaganda for the past sixty years. So many cases were filed against the big mouthed Karunanithi for casting aspersions on Hinduism and Hindu gods. He even said Lord Rama was a drunkard . All cases filed against such remarks were rejected by courts, while cases against blaspheming Islam are immediately taken up. why this partisan attitude even by courts. Is the relevant section IPC does not apply to Hindus?. Or is it because the judges are afraid of taking action against karunanithi. The judges reside in Greenways road, Chennai where the ministers also reside. Being surrounded by these persons, they are worried about their personal safety. Or is it because the judges are recommended by the politicians while being appointed. All right thinking and self respecting Hindus should think about this, if not the biased media.
Reply | Forward
khan
by mehmood on 2009-06-20 13:48:43.296178+05:30 SRK likes to be in media always to show himself "I am King Khan" whether it is his films or controversial statements.But he was out of the scene for a long time after IPL..He knows how to draw attention of the people..First he made a comment against Gavaskar during IPL n now on the Prophet (pbuh).He is a true drama baaz...those who are his fans are not even matured enough..How a Top class magazine make a printing mistake...
Reply | Forward
Reply to George Michael
by BROTHER on 2009-06-20 13:42:14.752415+05:30 Q: Can you travel to a station just ahead of the station for which you actually bought the ticket? Trapped. Huh? Have u given the right to ur son to dare speak on ur face, u being the guardian of ur home, head of family.(Forget US where a son sues his pops for reprimanding him.)If ur ans is yes,its for sure UR heading 4 trouble.This is but a natural system where u follow basic guideline which every 1 agrees is correct(ur ex of Iran)
Reply | Forward
one of our milestones
by Shantam prem on 2009-06-20 13:27:52.867761+05:30 Collectively these few names who started the religious movements in different part of the worlds are our heritage, our light posts, out elders...none is better than the other, their contribution is unique.But for God sake why few people simply get brain damage and become hysterical over these historical figures.And now the fire against Shah Rukh Khan,this man is very consistant in his approach, creates perfect balance between the religions.
Reply | Forward
SRK
by george michael on 2009-06-20 10:55:46.933998+05:30 Can an Indian muslim or pakisthan muslim become an Saudi emperor or the guardian of the holy mecca? But in India Ms.Mayawathi has become a chief minister, Mr. Balkrishnana has become chief justice, Ms Meira kumari the speaker based on their ability.Look at Iran the Islamic fundamentalists unilaterally rigged the poll and declared loser the victor and then slapped a universal ban on free speech, media and their own muslim brothers.The poor pakisthanis and afghans are in desperate poverty and have to take up arms and are experiencing the ill effects of the religion. The price this afghans and pakis paid for being loyal. While the rich arabs THE GUARDIANS are enjoying the freedom in the western nations. Muslims of indian subcontinent including pakis are discriminated in middle east, there is reservation for local arabs and after the Holy pilgrim the people from indian subcontinent cannot even stay a day extra.There is no democracy, freedom of speech or religion which we all take for grant
Reply | Forward
Sharukh Khan's baseless comments
by Farhat Buchh on 2009-06-20 10:25:16.8213+05:30 Shahruhk Khan has the brains of a dinosaur. Prophet Mohammad's legacy and historic importance is commented on by scholars who use emperical and historical information. Sharukh is talking without any indepth knowledge and understanding. Only bigots and idiots do that. I guess it is one way of gaining publicity when his career is in the dump.
Reply | Forward
1 Allow some freedom of expression
by Jas on 2009-08-18 21:17:13.422123+05:30Farhat, do only scholars have the right to their opinions? If so I know a very scholarly and intelligent person whom those rights were denied by bigots and idiots like you. His name is Salmon Rushdie. Moreover you yourself do not come across even a semi intelligent person, why are you then commenting on SRK?
Reply | Forward
Just think
by S K Srivastava on 2009-06-20 09:54:46.906736+05:30 It is time we show restrain and stop reacting to comments which are or may be derogatory and hurting religious sentiments. All religions claim to be tolernant and claim to promote peace and harmony than why be intolerant? Good sense must prevail to ignore them and avoid reasons which can cause conflicts because they give space to exploitation or to play politics and disturbs social harmony and impedes progress. We must rise above pettiness and compete equally to avail opportunities with one's own religious values. The religion is not the ritual but a discipline to conduct life-individual and social.This needs to be transpired to our young generation who awaits a bright future; let them not be confused.
Reply | Forward
backoff
by tenzin on 2009-06-20 04:05:08.062514+05:30 I think sharuk khan is one of the better and good exaple of muslim community. so these so called religious leader should backoff.
Reply | Forward
He is innocent
by truth on 2009-06-20 02:19:46.187592+05:30 this is the magazine error not SRK comment.he replied on the Q about the impressive figure in the history as follow"the most impressive figure is the Prophet Mohammed..Napoleon
Reply | Forward
Islam is God monopolizing
by Dharam on 2009-06-20 01:59:06.456291+05:30 Islam is a facist religion, since it cannot tolerate freedom of speech.Like the other Abhramic faith, it is a God monopolozing religion. Rational thought processes make it evident that all theologies that seek to monopolize God are obviously false and human made and have historicaly prooven to be one of prime causes of human intolerance and suffering.
Reply | Forward
Low tolerance thresholds
by B. Avi on 2009-06-20 01:47:07.512814+05:30 How many people read what Shah Rukh actually said? Maybe he meant something else. He is a successful man with better things to do than hurt people.It is fashionable to get ''hurt'' at everything nowadays. This tendency transcends religion, of course. What a waste of time fighting over something which might not even exist. Who has seen god? Then why fight over it. The average uneducated idiot who forms the bulk of the masses gets inflamed by this new excuse to hate. Hate leads to catharsis. So is religion nothing more than an excuse to hate someone and feel good about it? Increasingly so. Goodbye days of mysticism and spirituality. Welcome to the era of gun toting zealots and blood thirsty mob religion. At the end of the day, most of the "followers" do not even know why they believe in their "faiths". What foundation does it have? If god existed, would he be really so narrow minded as to want followers to go and dictate to others how to lead their live? Wake up people!
Reply | Forward
shahrukh said nothing wrong
by sanjeev on 2009-06-20 01:04:27.951321+05:30 its a fact that the ideology of prophet mohammad is promoting violence in the world. so what wrong did SRK said
Reply | Forward
Great Communicator
by Ashok on 2009-06-19 22:15:39.845543+05:30 Shah Rukh Khan is a great communicator,and there is no way there was an error. He should be honest and apologize instead of calling it an error! Indians are not naive.
Reply | Forward
Shahrukh and the Propohet
by G Krishnamurthy on 2009-06-19 21:41:45.909884+05:30 It is likely that the Prophet would not have been as hurt about Shahrukh's purported comments as his followers. After all, the Prophet was a great man. His followers today unfortunately lack his qualities.
Reply | Forward
Ignore what Shahrukh Khan has said, even if he had said
by Naim Naqvi on 2009-06-19 21:32:38.511673+05:30 Shah Rukh Khan, being a celebrity is a soft target. It is totally unacceptable what he said, if he said against the Prophet (P.B.U.H). However, to me he is neither a religious scholar nor a saint. His words do not carry any weight. The best option is to ignore the whole issue. Why to give so much currency to what he said if, he said? Now he is denying that statement and claims that they were not his words. Let the matter close. Every time someone says something against the established thoughts or persons, a band of religious vigilante gird up their loin to fight in the name of Islam. Every one can question the authenticity of public figures and their actions. As their message is supposed to be Universal so is their profile. They weren't the property of any specific religion. Let the people analyze their lives and make comments. Use your pen and your genius to contradict the opinions inimical to your's. It would be the better service of religion than burning effigies of Notanki Walas.
Reply | Forward
Do not comment on ISlam, look into your own affairs.
by NRI Engineer on 2009-06-19 20:56:55.676972+05:30 Why you all criticize Islam??Don't you see what's happening near Tirupathi, Kashi, Puri?If you are a true Hindu, go and look by yourself and work to erdicate AIDS near famous pligrim centres.Why don't you open your mouth against SATHI?Why not you preach equality and make a Dalit as Shankaracharya?
Reply | Forward
Shah Rukh Khan
by Nirode Mohanty on 2009-06-19 20:50:42.381299+05:30 It is not a good taste to comment harshly on the Prophet Mohammed who has a billion plus followers. But Khan 's comments are true as evidenced by the past events since the inception of Islam. Khan does not have to retrack back, but he does not want a Salman Rushdie's fate.India has a lot of intolerant people.
Reply | Forward
Prophet mohammed is remarkable figure in history.
by Dr.Sanam on 2009-06-19 20:47:07.80653+05:30 There is no one comparable to Prophet Mohammed (SAS) in History. If it is like Shahrukh says, writing mistake, we should forgive him. He must understand and read about Islam and Prophet more. Buning Effigy , Pelting stone , beating up on shoe is not Islamic way.
Reply | Forward
indian islamists should learn tolerance
by anupam on 2009-06-19 19:19:01.761551+05:30 islam isalam and christianity are religions spread by force-by sword,money and gun unlike religions originating in india. go read some world history books n then make comments. intolerance is the trademark of islam and the strands of christianity practised in india. BJP IS NOT A RELIGION why make such laugable comments.
Reply | Forward
Hindu Tolerance
by Gaga Gamer on 2009-06-19 18:40:42.81299+05:30 Oh well, if this was a Hindu, berating Hindu gods (like it happens everyday), the Govt. would have even provided a bandobast against protests - and if there were any protests (which is VERY UNLIKELY), they would have been very prompt in arresting and torturing any protesters - saying they were Hindu Terrorists.True religion teaches tolerance - and in the present day, one should enjoy freedom of expression. If they dont like it, they can show their displeasure by NOT going to any Shah Rukh film.I will not be surprised if the Government "arrests" Shah Rukh for creating "religious discontent" or some such silly rule.
Reply | Forward
Islam is the second largest religion of World. It deserves some respect.
by surendra on 2009-06-19 18:37:43.688479+05:30 Despite of some of the zealots and fanatics in Islam, it deserves some respect. Like BJP, despite of being a trouble maker and a user party, deserves some respect for being the second largest party in India. There is no difference in BJP and Islam except that they represent two different religions. Deep inside most of you would agree with me but even Indian Express would hesitate to print this controversial letter.
Reply | Forward
Shah Rukh Khan
by Shekhar on 2009-06-19 18:35:04.254408+05:30 No one has got the point, Shah Rukh never compared the prophet Mohommed to a negative character. SRK is a strong, and devout muslim, and understands the tennets of the relegion better than the clerics who are defaming him, and the idiots who are burning and beating his effigies. I am NOT against public venting there frustration VIA burning effigies and beating up putlas, but it has to be for a real reason. The cleric should have simply made a call or write a letter to him, and pointed out that fact to him, and I am sure that SRK would have make a public apology. But doing it publicly in this manner, and misleading the public always incite the wrong emotions, and situation and circumstances within the community and country. I am with truth, therefore I am with SRK..let good sense prevail, and let us Indians lead that path..hindu, muslim sikhs, christians or tribals!
Reply | Forward
Shahrukh
by kabir on 2009-06-19 18:25:22.285515+05:30 He is absolutely right what he said.There is no relvance of that ........This is a out dated thesis. This though has nomeaning in present scenario.Good luck Sha Rukh
Reply | Forward
Shahrukh's effigy
by manish on 2009-06-19 17:49:59.421384+05:30 God knows who is right. The protestors or Mr. Khan? He has freedom of expression, they have freedom of religion and thus freedom to take action against people hurting their religious sentiments. Thank God! No fatwa was issued.
Reply | Forward
Free Speech
by Raj on 2009-06-19 17:36:41.664176+05:30 I guess ShahRukh Khan is eyeing for politics.He is trying to come out and show India that he is secular (like Advani did in Pak trip). May be this incident help him in reaching his hopes.
Reply | Forward
Shah rukh khan
by george on 2009-06-19 17:24:27.580678+05:30 Prophet mohd.lived 600 yearsago.He preached what was relevant to that time. If people still believe in him and his teachings then why talk anabout him and invite controversies?We try to glorify and defame people who have been long gone.
Reply | Forward
1 correction
by syed ali on 2009-06-20 10:05:46.544782+05:30Prophet Mohammed was born in Mecca about 1400 years ago. He is a personality above Jesus, Moses or any other prophet. You need to understand the situation of arabia at that time and the war he fought to bring light in that region.
Reply | Forward
Shah Rukh's effigy beaten up with chappals
by azhar on 2009-06-19 17:01:32.559702+05:30 This reaction from the community was very much expected. Nobody can speak against the prophet even though that person who is speaking against the prophet is right.This is the golden rule.
Reply | Forward
India is a democracy and every person has the right to express its views
by DR.RELIGION on 2009-06-19 15:35:31.179799+05:30 India is a democracy and every person has the right to express its views, therefore, the police should take proper actions against religious fanatics asap.
Reply | Forward