Screenindia : Regional
PopularNews
Most Emailed Articles
Most Read Articles

‘Pazhassi Raja has significance on national level’

-A +A
Font
Unni R. Nair Posted: Oct 09, 2009 at 1426 hrs IST
Mammootty
Pazhassi Raja, one of the most eagerly awaited films of the recent times, is based on epic proportions. The mega-budget film (made at a budget never heard of before in Malayalam Cinema), has none other than Mammootty in title role. The National award winning actor met Screen at Palani (Pazhani), where he was shooting for his new film, Chattambinaaduv

How did this film happen, with you, Hariharan and M.T.Vasudevan Nair coming together after so long, a gap of time?
It was twenty years back, in 1989, that we had got together to make Oru Vadakkan …, which was taken from the folklores of Kerala. The film got many awards and I got the National award for that movie, along with of course Adoor Gopalakrishnan’s film too. And after that, we were thinking of doing another film on the same lines. We thought of many stories from the folklore. Then we started thinking of a historical. But the thing was that earlier Kerala was divided into many smaller kingdoms and hence there were not many war heroes, who could have an appeal all over Kerala, in cinematic terms. It was then that we discussed Pazhassi Raja, the king who led a rebellion against the British to protect his crown, his kingdom. It was all there, recorded in the history. We just had to do some amount of research and fill up some gaps.

What made you think of such a movie, once again on the same lines as Oru Vadakkan …?
There is no similarity between these two movies, except of course the team involved. Oru Vadakkan …was taken from our folklore and Pazhassi Raja is history, pure recorded history.

This film is, reportedly made on a budget of 25 crores, a very big budget for a Malayalam film.
In fact, the start was small, but it later became a big thing. It had to, considering the pain taken, the characters included and of course many other aspects involved.

The film is being released in different languages too. Have you dubbed for all the versions yourself?
I have dubbed only for Malayalam and Tamil. I would have loved to dub for the other languages too. But I was busy with lots of other work too.

Would you call Pazhassi Raja commercial movie, especially since it’s a real big budget film?
Of course it is. Pazhassi Raja should not be seen as an art-house movie. It has all the ingredients of a commercial movie, though it is artistically made.

Pazhassi Raja has been made at a budget that could be called ‘improbable’ as regards the Kerala market. So how would the film be marketed?
As I said earlier, it all went up. But now that the film is made and ready for release on October 2nd, they have got definite plans to market it, not only in Kerala, but all over. The subject has much significance on the national level too. It’s not just history. It’s no period film either. It’s the story of a freedom fighter and hence it has national significance. And international too.

There are so many stars involved- Sarath Kumar, Padmapriya, Manoj.K.Jayan, Suresh Krishna etc.
All these stars play pivotal roles, all taken from history.

Did you have to prepare much for the role, especially since there is lot of martial arts involved?
Not much, I mean especially in acting out the character. As for the martial arts, I have done all that before too, in Oru Vadakkan … . It’s not a new thing for me.

But that was 20 years back. And the body has grown twenty years older?
I don’t think that matters. It didn’t matter for me at all. And I didn’t need much of preparation too.

But in 20 years, the tastes and sensibilities of the film-viewing public have changed. So, is it really wise to release a film with such a subject on a commercial level in today’s changed scenario?
Why not? It is a good film, made in a very planned and elaborate manner. You have the best of people working for it, including MT, Hariharan, Illayaraja, Resul Pookutty etc. People should like it. Anyway, let’s wait and see.

PostComments
Post Comments
Name * Message *
Email ID *
Subject *
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.
ViewComments
true fiction by nidhin on 2009-10-21 16:47:50.165907+05:30 I agree to what abhijit says.. priya u r mistaken..

Reply | Forward

Pazhassi Raja more fiction than fact by Priya on 2009-10-08 10:09:37.979664+05:30 Anyone who is familiar with the history of Kerala before propagandists started to invent history for commercial and political reasons, know that a Kottayam Royal Family did NOT exist, neither in the present Kottayam district which was formed as a revenue district of Travancore kingdom in 1754, much less in North Kerala referred to as Malabar District during British Raj. With each new rendering the character of Pazhassi Raja is getting more and more bombastic. The prominent rulers of North Kerala, Malabar district, were the Zamorins of Calicut. There was no such character called a king by the name of Pazhassi Raja. Starting from 1766, Haider Ali and his son Tippu Sultan of Mysore annexed not only the powerful kingdom of the Zamorins but also smaller, insignificant ones which were mainly principalities. The present districts Kannur, Wayanad, Kozhikode (Calicut), Mallapuram and Palakkad (Palghat) in north and central Kerala had been annexed by Haider Ali and Tippu Sultan. It went on to become the Malabar District during British Raj in 1795, after the Hindu rulers accepted the help of British to oust Tippu Sultan. So to introduce a non-existent Kottayam Royal Family into the movie has nothing to with history. It is propaganda for a commercial purpose. It is well known that during British Raj, the two princely kingdoms, the Princely State of Cochin in central Kerala, comprising of today's Thrissur and Ernakulam districts, and the princely state of Travancore in the South, comprising of today's Idukki, Kottayam, Pathanamthitta (part of Kottayam until 1982), Alapuzha (Allepey), Kollam (Quilon) and Thiruvanathapuram (Trivandrum), including Kanyakumari district of present Tamil Nad, had good relations with the British. Especially in Travancore state, British missionaries worked with the consent of the king to develop the state. English schools, colleges, press, plantation of rubber etc led to rapid advancement of the kingdom. The only recorded freedom struggle or rebellion against the British took place in North Kerala, Malabar District. It is known as Moplah (Mapillah) Rebellion of 1921. It was crushed by the British army which had mostly Hindu soldiers. The Nair community was particularly known for their bravery and formed the bulk of the army. They had helped oust the Dutch from Travancore with the aid of British.

Reply | Forward

1 haha
by jon on 2009-10-16 10:10:44.56871+05:30are you a malayalee or a tamilan??? how can u say that pazzhasi raja never exist.. ohh man u are such a loser

Reply | Forward

2 priya pazhassi is not a fictional character
by abhijith on 2009-10-15 22:53:36.713483+05:30priya it is not true that pazhassi raja is a fictional character because the kottayam royal family from which pazhassi hails is situated in kannur (nr Thalassery) the pazhassi raja helped british in the war against tippu ,after the mysore war sreerangapattanam treaty was signed on 1792 according to it all teriitorie captured by tippu sultan was given back to british except some parts of wayanad which was given to pazhassi after the war british diidnt support pazhassi because he collected taxes from people directlyand didn't gave any part of it to british so british allowed kurumbranad raja (uncle of pazhassi ) of kottayam royal family to collect the tax who accepted every term put forth by the british and due to this reason pazhassi raged war against british 50 years before the first war of independence with the help from the kurichya tribe he followed guerila war fare and presented british many defeats he fought against them for about 10 years straighth atlast british brutally surpressed his rebellion with modern war equipments which were not available to pazhassi,atlast when he was surrounded he ate his ring coated with poison and died before he was captured by british. not much is not known about his life because british destroyed almost all written hstorical data available and you must understand that kollathiri aliraja or zamorin was not only the main rulers of northern kerala it is not a plot to maake money it is a story based on written data's which have survived and if you want more proof just visit wayanad you could see a memorial dedecated to him and the pazhassi dam which serves as a water source for farmers in kannur is named after him and there is museum dedicated to him .even the british regarded him as the noblest of foe and cremated his body with royal honours atlast i want to ask you a question have you ever read your tenth std text book if you haven't read it please go read it the book tell about kerala varma pazhassi thamburan

Reply | Forward

1 there are two kottayams in kerala
by manoj on 2009-10-22 18:39:30.344463+05:30ther are actually two places called kottayam in kerala. any one residing in northern part of kerala is more familiar with the northern place called kottayam. it is a pity that you make stupid remarks about something which you dont know . a little knowledge is a dangerous thing.

Reply | Forward

3 dear sis...
by rinz on 2009-10-08 12:24:08.836383+05:30 frm whr u copied ths paragrph??? :-D :-D :-D

Reply | Forward