Screenindia : Screen Latest News
PopularNews
Most Emailed Articles
Most Read Articles

Is ‘Slumdog Millionaire’ an achievement for Bollywood?

-A +A
Font
Kunal Pradhan Posted: Jan 29, 2009 at 1028 hrs IST
Slumdog millionaire
Back in 1980, Richard Attenborough had come to our country, armed with an ensemble cast including Ben Kingsley, Candice Bergen, Edward Fox and John Geilgud, to tell the story of a man credited with making the very concept of India possible.

Gandhi (1982), a soufflé of Attenborough’s stars from the West, with some distinctly Indian ingredients in the form of Alyque Padamsee, Roshan Seth, Saeed Jaffrey and Amrish Puri, wowed both international audiences and hard-nosed critics.

The film won eight Oscars and got Kingsley and Rohini Hattangadi, who played Kasturba Gandhi, a BAFTA each. After Gandhi, both actors went as far as they were allowed to by their respective film industries. Kingsley became Sir Ben and acted in films such as Turtle Diary, Bugsy, Schindler’s List, Artificial Intelligence and House of Sand and Fog; Hattangadi is best remembered for her flimsy, tufted-hair, lipstick-on-cheeks portrayal of an evil aunt in Chaalbaaz.

Now, 27 years after Attenborough’s magnum opus — which plays on our TV sets every national holiday — another British filmmaker, armed with another local narrative, a tale of poverty, oppression, aspiration and love, has brought India into the spotlight.

Slumdog Millionaire, quickly appropriated as “our” movie, is up for nine academy awards — having already won four Golden Globes — and India is finding it hard to keep its excitement under check. But is it right for Bollywood and the local media to celebrate it as a coming of age of our 300-titles-a-year cinema? On the contrary, isn’t it proof of the inadequacy or our film industry rather than a monument to it?

Danny Boyle is one of the brightest new directors today. But he doesn’t command an aura like Steven Spielberg or Martin Scorsese. A film by him doesn’t guarantee critical acclaim and box-office riches. He’s created a much smaller appeal for himself by tackling strangely diverse subjects. From the flesh-eating zombies of 28 Days Later to the star-savers of Sunshine, from drug addiction in Trainspotting to the saintly innocence of Millions, Boyle’s films make the 52-year-old director seem 20 years younger because his stories are a reflection of modern life. Boyle’s world is our world, its different facets shown from within, always fresh, never repetitive. For him, the simplicity of our daily grind is both exciting and complicated — no need for James Ivory’s period dramas, Ron Howard’s big-budget biopics, or Quentin Tarantino’s uber-cool preaching.

The genius of Boyle is that Slumdog is not a story about India but a genuinely Indian story. Even more so than Mira Nair’s Monsoon Wedding or Deepa Mehta’s Water — both relevant, both provocative, but both somehow telling Indian tales to foreign audiences. The only allowance he’s made is using 10 million instead of one crore. With an age-old Indian formula, keeping away from his trademark use of stylized hues, Boyle has left the film true to its Bollywood form.

PostComments
Post Comments
Name * Message *
Email ID *
Subject *
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.
ViewComments
No comments posted yet. Be the first one to post the comment.