Screenindia : Screen Latest News
PopularNews
Most Emailed Articles
Most Read Articles

Brand endorsements for Bollywood stars take a hit!

-A +A
Font
Screen Team Posted: Dec 08, 2008 at 1645 hrs IST
Bollywood
Slashing of star fees and non-renewal of contracts is the likely impact of recession in the advertising industry.

At a time when several recession-hit producers are keeping ambitious projects on hold, brand endorsements once the biggest source of income for stars too seems to have taken a hit. Not only is there a major cut in the endorsement fees, but also there is also little demand for renewals of existing contracts. Though the huge slump in the advertising budgets and a drastic cut in celebrity endorsements fees is inevitable, the situation may actually help advertisers convince stars to sign endorsement contracts at lesser fees over the next year, according to Prahlad Kakkar.

Explaining the current advertising scenario, he says, “The dynamic rise in endorsement fees was being fuelled by corporates and MNCs who wanted to flaunt the growth of their business. But now, the scenario is different. Advertising budgets are being slashed and this will be passed on to endorsement fees as well.” Kakkar said that the brand endorsement business functions on the economics of supply and demand. According to him, as of now, there are few takers for brand ambassadors. However, in the next few months, advertisers may realize that it is a major opportunity to sign new brand endorsement contracts at lesser prices and that too, for longer durations! A likely offset of the trend is also reduction in number of public appearances made by the stars. Translated literally, it means busy actors will have the option of signing more brands for lesser time commitment.

As such, bulk brand endorsements signed at lower fees may well be the silver lining. In fact, Kareena Kapoor, who is reported to have charged a whopping Rs 7 crore for endorsing Pepsico’s snack food, is looking at signing a few endorsement contracts in January, according to a source associated with her business decisions. On the other hand, Emami, which is said to have roped in the actress for Boro Plus two years ago at a fee of Rs 2 crore, has not yet renewed their contract with the actress. Replying via email, Devadeep Ghosh, Emami spokesperson said that though most of the company’s celebrity endorsement contracts are signed for a period of four years, they couldn’t divulge the actress’s contract renewal date since it can lead to ‘unnecessary speculation’.

Meanwhile, responding to whether recession will see Emami replacing their current brand ambassadors that include Shah Rukh Khan and Amitabh Bachchan as well, Ghosh answered in the negative with, “Since stars are brand ambassadors themselves, our association with them reinforces the communication of trust, the power of brand and image recall.” It may be recalled here that the company has just renewed its contract with both the brand ambassadors earlier this year in July for a period of two and a half years. However, this is definitely not a universal strategy. For new entrants in the Indian market, there seems to be hesitation in going ahead with the best of Bollywood brand ambassadors. For instance, J.Hampstead whose contract with Priyanka Chopra is valid only till early 2009 has not yet initiated talks for renewal, confirmed Ajay Chandwani, Executive Director, Percept H, the advertising agency that created the campaign starring Chopra.

It is clear that brand endorsement contracts will continue to be signed as well as renewals scraped over the next one-year, each having its set of recession-sparked terms and conditions. As to which stars will use them to survive the recession wave, is something only time will tell.

PostComments
Post Comments
Name * Message *
Email ID *
Subject *
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.
ViewComments
Star Power Ads by Keshav Mathur on 2008-12-08 20:11:48.515963+05:30 Gimme a break! I wont use a fairness cream coz SRK endorses it. I dont use a pain-relieving balm coz AB says I shd. I watch TataSky coz I love it, not b'coz Amir says so. I never go to Pantaloons tho Priyanka says I shd. I have better taste and am discerning. I dont drink Pepsi, I dont eat Lays, and even if I do occasionally, its not b'coz of Kareena. I bought an Airtel connection years ago not b'coz a pretty girl crash-landed in the jungles and called her Dad to say she was ok. Its great to use Bollywood's star power to convince people to endorse the product. But which segment of the population are the advertisers targetting on NDTV, CNN-IBN, Times-Now etc. The educated middle-class? Gimme a break! Why must advertisers believe that India is stupid, gullible and a sucker? Each time AB comes on the tele to endorse a product, I change channels. Stuff the product! Stuff AB! Let Ad agencies come up with original ideas. Appeal to us intelligently. Dont devalue our perceptions!

Reply | Forward

Cost cutting by Mahesh on 2008-12-08 11:14:54.082646+05:30 Bringing star ambasadors in TV advertisment with whopping fees is a mere wastage of money, which corporates should stop and in fact, lesser the price of their product. Its worthless to pay 7 crore to Karina for Pepsico ad. Probably, the corporate will learn this from west, where CEOs are asked to cut cost wherever is possible e.g. usage of charter plane.

Reply | Forward