|
OSCARS: Do we stand a chance at all?
The
first Oscar nomination India got was for Mehboob Khans
Mother India. And even the memorable yesteryear classic failed
to bring home the coveted
THE
LAST 13 FILMS SENT BY THE FFI
Below is the list of films recommended by the Film Federation
of India for the Oscar Award in the category of Best Foreign
Film:
1988 -- Salam Bombay - Hindi (nominated)
1989 -- Parinda - Hindi (not nominated)
1990 -- Anjali - Telugu (not nominated)
1991 -- Heena - Hindi (not nominated)
1992 -- Thevar Magan - Tamil (not nominated)
1993 -- Rudaali - Hindi (not nominated)
1994 -- Muhafiz - Hindi (not nominated)
1995 -- Kurudhi Punal - Telugu (not nominated)
1996 -- Indian - Tamil (not nominated)
1997 -- Guru - Malayalam (not nominated)
1998 -- Jeans - Tamil (not nominated)
1999 -- 1947 - The Earth - Hindi (not nominated)
2000 -- Hey! Ram - Tamil (not nominated) |
statuette.
Later, Salaam Bombay also was nominated, though it, too, failed
to come up trumps at the Oscars. Barring these two films no
other film sent by the FFI has even won a nomination. Bandit
Queen, our best bet, perhaps at bringing home the trophy,
was sent by the FFI, but had to be withdrawn on court orders...
What plagues our movies at the Oscars? Obviously, either our
films lack International appeal or there is something terribly
wrong with the selection committee of the FFI. Or perhaps
both. Prominent film industry leaders comment on the issue...
CHANGE IS IMMATERIAL
Shakti Samanta
SAYS the president of the Film Federation of India, "The
FFI has been selecting films on the basis of whoever attends
the selection committee meetings. Those who have no time and
are busy dont attend, thats been the practice
for years.
Even if we set up a separate committee to select films, how
will it help unless the members attend? A lot again depends
on what other members of the Federation want. But the practice
is that two representatives of each affiliated body will form
a body to select the films for the Oscars. Unless all members
of the Federation want it to be changed I can not change it.
In any case, there is still time for the 2002 Oscars. We will
decide about it later."
Few films have international appeal
Shyam Benegal
THERE are two issue involved. One is that the FFI should
select films that international audiences will relate to.
Very few of the total number of films made in a year have
international appeal. Satyajit Rays films had this quality.
Secondly the film selected by the FFI should have been released
in the West so that members of the Oscar Committee have had
the chance to see it. This helps. But the FFI takes these
considerations very casually. They should keep in their mind
that whichever film they select should be able to compete
with the best films made by other countries.
Time for a relook at selection procedure
Govind Nihalani
THERE is a need to review the whole procedure of selecting
films for the Oscar awards. There is no point in sending the
usual commercial hit. Films with fresh ideas that are handled
with a passion and commitment should be sent. But here provincialism
takes precedence. We have to view films dispassionately. We
must send films that suit the country. Each festival or award
has a personality of its own. One has to consider it. The
FFI should consider why its selected film does not get nominated.
There is no point in repeating the same mistake over and over
again. Whenever our films do not get nominated in the category
of foreign films, we talk about it and promptly forget all
about it. In my opinion, the FFI must set up a committee of
expert filmmakers numbering three or five who know what type
of films ought to be sent for nominations in this category.
Our films need to be promoted too
Amit Khanna
The
films nominated this year
The five films nominated in the category of best foreign
language films are:
Amores Perros (Mexico)
Croaching Tigers, Hidden Dragon (Taiwan)
Divided We Fall (Czech Republic)
Everybody Famous (Belgium)
The Taste of Others (France) |
I agree
that some times, the FFIs choices have been wrong. Earlier,
there used to be a demarcation of commercial and parallel
cinema. Now, that gap has been bridged. Yet, the choices remain
bad. It is not enough to select a film. It must also be promoted
well in the USA. Shekhar Kapur says a lot of public relations
work and lobbying is needed to promote a film. Producers from
other countries who have entered their films in the foreign
language category spend a lot of money hosting parties and
supplying VHS copies of their films to all members of the
Oscar Committee. They even advertise their films in the papers
in the USA. It involves a lot of money to promote the selected
film. Selecting films through regional representatives should
be avoided.
Who cares for the Oscars?
Mahesh Bhatt
I dont give a damn for the Oscar. I make films for
the Indian audience, to suit the Indian tastes and idiom,
which is unparalleled in in the world. We dont need
recognition from the West that a film is great. I dont
know why we seek their blessings for our films year after
year. They have a different outlook on life. If you covet
their award you must play their game, in a manner that caters
to their tastes and liking.
Wheres the quality?
Vidhu Vinod Choprpa
I had the distinction of having my short film, Encounter
with Faces getting a nomination. My film Mission Kashmir ought
to have been selected by the Film Federation of India, but
became a victim of the internal politics. I am of the view
that the only reason our films havent been winning Oscars
is that they do not possess quality.
MSM Desai
|