|
THERE THEY GO
AGAIN!
IT
sure doesnt take much to enthuse our filmfolk. That
fact was driven home to us all over again, last week, when
Sushma Swaraj, the current incumbent in the information and
broadcasting ministry, visited Mumbai. Much the same people
who derided the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce
and Industries (FICCI), and questioned its motives in taking
up cudgels on behalf of showbiz, were seen unabashedly attending
its latest do a meeting of industry folk with the minister.
And sure enough, Swaraj appeared all too eager to please them
all, gleefully hugging most of them as if they were her longlost
kin.
So whats come of the meet? Another notification that
apparently promises much but delivers precious little, much
like the industry status announced for moviedom more than
two years ago. This time, the government has announced recognition
for the entertainment industry under the IDBI Act, 1964, which
means that every activity in showbiz has now been formally
approved as part of the general list of industrial concerns.
At the interactive meet, last week, at which Yashwant Sinha,
the union finance minister was also present, the finance ministry
issued the notification. Getting approval under the IDBI Act
signifies that, henceforth, the industry can access loans
and every facility available to other industries. A finance
ministry official even suggested that thus far, the only reason
bank finance hasnt been forthcoming for showbiz was
that the IDBI Act had remained a stumbling block.
The euphoria with which the notification has been greeted
by our filmfolk reminds one of the celebrations that followed
the announcement of industry status in May 1998. They forget
that little has changed for the industry since then, status
or no status. The reason? Industry status is a state subject,
over which the centre has little or no jurisdiction. The centre,
at best, can only issue a formal letter of recognition, while
most of the benefits accruing to industry are actually under
the purview of the states. The fanfare, notwithstanding, none
of the states have extended any of these benefits to showbiz,
yet.
NOW
FOR THE FINEPRINT
NOW, that the IDBI recognition is finally here for showbiz,
loans will be readily forthcoming from the Industrial Development
Bank of India, or so the notification promises us. But will
they? Approach the IDBI for loans, and youll soon realise
that the ground rules for loan disbursements havent
changed at all.
Assessments will be made strictly on merit, track record as
a corporate entity and transparency. How many of our filmmakers
do you reckon will pass this test? Hardly a few. Whats
more, those that do arent the sort whod need bank
loans the most. And sadly, the ones that are in dire need
of bank funding are hardly likely to get past the first hurdle.
Again, were told that with the IDBI showing the way,
it will only be a matter of time before other financial institutions
such as the ICICI and IFCI, both of which are companies under
the Companies Act, also jump into the fray. Here, too, the
optimism will soon prove to be naive and misplaced, for neither
the ICICI nor IFCI will be any more lenient in the disbursement
of loans than the IDBI. Ask those who sought loans with the
nationalised banks in recent times, only to come away sadder
and wiser.
The fact of the matter is, financial institutions do not function
purely with a charity motive. Profits and the bottomline are
as important to them as to the neighbourhood loan shark, because
they are answerable to their investors. The only difference
may well lie only in the matter of interest rates.
With films continuing to fall like nine pins at the turnstiles,
the outlook is pretty bleak. The IDBI and the other FIs can
hardly be expected to overlook the trend of flops at the box-office.
Mark our words: never mind what their sales pitch tells us,
they arent desperate to bail out all our resource crunch-hit
filmmakers.
Before long, our filmmakers will again realise theyd
sung all their paeans in praise of Sushma Swaraj way too early.
The IDBI recognition, like the industry status shed
doled out in 1998, isnt even worth the paper its
printed on, at least for the majority of our filmmakers. We
hope were proved wrong.
Shaju
George Alex
|